Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Modeling the Multiple Sclerosis Specialist Nurse Workforce by Determination of Optimum Caseloads in the United Kingdom.

International journal of MS care·2021

Same author

The Use of Digital and Remote Communication Technologies as a Tool for Multiple Sclerosis Management: Narrative Review.

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies·2018

Same author

Effect of a New Purified Collagen Matrix With Polyhexamethylene Biguanide on Recalcitrant Wounds of Various Etiologies: A Case Series.

Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice·2018

Same author

Multiple sclerosis: dealing with complex treatment decisions.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2018

Same author

Variations in multiple sclerosis practice within Europe - Is it time for a new treatment guideline?

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2016

Same author

Multiple sclerosis: managing a complex neurological disease.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2014

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

Specialist nurse network improves MS practice.

Nikki Ward¹, Nikki Embrey, Clare Lowndes

¹Faculty of Health and Community Care, University of Central England.

Nursing Times

|August 10, 2002

Summary

This study details a support group for multiple sclerosis (MS) nurse specialists. The network improved clinical practice, reduced isolation, and addressed work-related stress for independent MS nurses.

Area of Science:

Nursing
Clinical Practice
Healthcare Professional Development

Background:

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) nurse specialists often work independently, facing professional isolation.
There is a need for dedicated clinical supervision and networking opportunities for these specialists.
Existing support structures may not adequately address the unique challenges faced by MS nurses.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe the development and evolution of a peer support group for MS nurse specialists.
To outline the structure and content of the group meetings.
To evaluate the impact of the group on clinical practice, professional isolation, and work-related stress.

Main Methods:

Development of a collaborative network for MS nurse specialists.

More Related Videos

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: July 19, 2019

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: January 29, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: July 19, 2019

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: January 29, 2016

Regular group meetings focused on clinical supervision and professional exchange.

Qualitative assessment of the network's impact on participants' practice and well-being.

Main Results:

The group successfully provided clinical supervision and networking opportunities.
Participation led to significant improvements in clinical practice among MS nurse specialists.
The interactive network effectively reduced feelings of isolation and helped manage work-related stress.

Conclusions:

A dedicated, collaborative network is vital for supporting MS nurse specialists.
Such groups enhance clinical practice and professional development.
Peer support networks can mitigate the challenges of independent practice and improve specialist well-being.