Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimization of multidetector array CT acquisition parameters for CT colonography.

C H McCollough1

  • 1Department of Radiology, E2-A, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Abdominal Imaging
|August 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A New Frontier in Temporal Bone Imaging: Photon-Counting Detector CT Demonstrates Superior Visualization of Critical Anatomic Structures at Reduced Radiation Dose.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

Use of artificial intelligence in computed tomography dose optimisation.

Annals of the ICRP·2020
Same author

Evaluation of Lower-Dose Spiral Head CT for Detection of Intracranial Findings Causing Neurologic Deficits.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2019
Same author

Comparison of a Photon-Counting-Detector CT with an Energy-Integrating-Detector CT for Temporal Bone Imaging: A Cadaveric Study.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2018
Same author

Dual Energy CT Kidney Stone Differentiation in Photon Counting Computed Tomography.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2017
Same author

Low-Dose CT for Craniosynostosis: Preserving Diagnostic Benefit with Substantial Radiation Dose Reduction.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2017
Same journal

Abstracts of selected papers from the current literature.

Abdominal imaging·2016
Same journal

How the radiologist can add value in the evaluation of the pre- and post-surgical pancreas.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

Erratum to: Hot spleen: hypervascular lesions of the spleen.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

Cross-sectional imaging, with surgical correlation, of patients presenting with complications after remote bariatric surgery without bowel obstruction.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

The ability of 18F-choline PET/CT to identify local recurrence of prostate cancer.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

T1-hyperintense renal lesions: can high signal predict lack of enhancement?

Abdominal imaging·2015
See all related articles

Optimizing multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) parameters is key. This study found that standard, not necessarily thin-scan or low-noise, techniques effectively visualize clinically relevant polyps.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Computed Tomography

Background:

  • Multidetector array computed tomography (MDCT) involves numerous acquisition parameters.
  • Optimizing parameters like collimation, scan width, interval, pitch, noise, and dose is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine criteria for optimizing MDCT acquisition parameters.
  • To determine the impact of parameter selection on polyp visualization and patient dose.

Main Methods:

  • A water phantom with tissue-equivalent polyps was scanned using various MDCT parameter combinations.
  • X-ray tube current was adjusted to match dose and noise levels to a single-detector array technique.
  • Images were evaluated in both axial and three-dimensional (3D) formats.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All polyps were successfully visualized in both axial and 3D images across all tested scan parameters.
  • Higher table speed values resulted in noticeable helical artifacts.
  • The optimal visualization of the smallest polyps (5 x 5 or 7 x 3 mm) was achieved with 5-mm-wide scans at 3-mm intervals.

Conclusions:

  • Thin-scan and low-noise MDCT techniques are not essential for visualizing clinically significant polyp sizes.
  • Standard acquisition parameters can be sufficient for effective polyp detection, potentially simplifying scan protocols.