Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Houston, we've had a problem: when do we override rules?

Daniel E Haun1, Argie Leach, Rita Vivero

  • 1Department of Pathology, Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans, New Orleans, USA. dhaun@lsuhsc.edu

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|August 15, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and feasibility of an electronic white blood cell identification trainer.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2013
Same author

Quality in a poorer NHS. Gross and net are not the same.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2009
Same author

Computer use in an urban university hospital: technology ahead of literacy.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2006
Same author

Students' perceptions of laboratory science careers: changing ideas with an education module.

Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology·2005
Same author

Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians: ...and our impact on one another is important.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2004
Same author

Information-to-go: publishing organization-specific information for personal digital assistants.

Joint Commission journal on quality and safety·2004

Healthcare rules are essential, but sometimes deviating from them is necessary to improve patient outcomes. This study offers a framework for managing and teaching these essential exceptions.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Ethics
  • Patient Care

Background:

  • Established healthcare regulations are critical for patient safety and consistent quality of care.
  • However, rigid adherence to all rules may not always align with optimal individual patient outcomes.
  • The dynamic nature of patient needs necessitates a nuanced approach to healthcare policy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the rationale for making exceptions to healthcare rules.
  • To present a structured framework for documenting, discussing, and teaching the process of rule deviation.
  • To emphasize the importance of adaptive rule application in maximizing patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of clinical scenarios requiring rule exceptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a multi-faceted framework for exception management.
  • Literature review on ethical decision-making in healthcare.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key factors influencing the decision to deviate from healthcare rules.
    • Proposed a framework encompassing documentation, communication, and educational strategies for rule exceptions.
    • Highlighted the benefits of a flexible approach to rules for enhancing patient-centered care.

    Conclusions:

    • Deviating from healthcare rules, when justified, can significantly improve patient outcomes.
    • A systematic framework is crucial for the responsible implementation and teaching of rule exceptions.
    • Promoting adaptive rule interpretation is vital for advancing patient care and medical ethics.