Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lessons not learned from the generalist initiatives.

Janet H Senf1, Doug Campos-Outcalt, Randa M Kutob

  • 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA. jsenf@arizona.edu

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|August 15, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Grouping primary care specialties like internal medicine, pediatrics, and family medicine for research can lead to inaccurate conclusions. Analyzing specialties individually reveals unique predictive factors for medical student choices, enhancing understanding of primary care.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

US Preventive Services Task Force: What Does the Future Hold?

American family physician·2026
Same author

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Standards for Assessing Evidence.

JAMA·2025
Same author

Practice Alert: Meningococcal Vaccines.

American family physician·2025
Same author

Practice Alert: Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines Approved for Adults.

American family physician·2025
Same author

Practice Alert: CDC Guidelines on Doxycycline for STI Postexposure Prophylaxis.

American family physician·2024
Same author

Use of 21-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Among U.S. Adults: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2024.

MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report·2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education Research
  • Primary Care Medicine

Background:

  • Research often groups general internal medicine, general pediatrics, and family medicine.
  • This aggregation may obscure important differences between specialties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of grouping primary care specialties in research.
  • To highlight the importance of analyzing individual specialties for accurate findings.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing studies on predicting medical students' primary care specialty choices.
  • Comparison of predictive factors across general internal medicine, general pediatrics, and family medicine.

Main Results:

  • Grouping specialties can limit information value and lead to erroneous conclusions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Predictive factors for specialty choice differ significantly among the three primary care specialties.
  • Some factors are unique to individual specialties, while others are common.

    • Conclusions:

    • Medical students entering primary care specialties are not a homogeneous group.
    • Analyzing primary care specialties individually provides greater insight than grouped analysis.
    • Future research should consider statistical comparisons between specialty groups or focus on single specialties.