Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Cerebral Hemispheres01:05

Cerebral Hemispheres

The human brain, a complex organ, is functionally divided into two cerebral hemispheres—left and right. These hemispheres are interconnected by a structure of paramount importance, the corpus callosum. This substantial bundle of neural fibers is not just a bridge between the hemispheres but a crucial element for the brain's comprehensive functioning. It enables efficient communication between the two hemispheres, allowing each side of the brain to control and receive sensory and motor...
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attosecond-Angstrom free-electron-laser towards the cold beam limit.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Characterisation of microbunching instability with 2D Fourier analysis.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

First Report of Plasmodiophora brassicae on Cabbage in Eastern North Carolina.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Effects of chronic caffeine exposure during adolescence and subsequent acute caffeine challenge during adulthood on rat brain serotonergic systems.

Neuropharmacology·2018
Same author

Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Response of tussock tundra to elevated carbon dioxide regimes: analysis of ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> flux through nonlinear modeling.

Oecologia·2017
Same journal

Hypercholesterolemia-induced impairment in sorafenib functionality is overcome by avasimibe co-treatment.

Journal of biosciences·2026
Same journal

Evolutionary trade-offs in plant immunity: prioritizing antiviral priming by herbivore-induced plant volatiles over defense against herbivores.

Journal of biosciences·2026
Same journal

Birds and bees do not express RAGE: comparative physiology and non-conventional model organisms hold the key to hyperglycemia tolerance.

Journal of biosciences·2026
Same journal

Distinct macrophage and microglia function in ischemic stroke.

Journal of biosciences·2026
Same journal

Dynamic attributes of the pedicel: Key drivers, structure and function in angiosperms.

Journal of biosciences·2026
Same journal

Cardiometabolomic signatures and gut microbiota dynamics in perinatally undernourished F<sub>1</sub> offspring: Decoding the metabolic footprint.

Journal of biosciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
08:10

Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa

Published on: February 2, 2018

Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection.

P H Williams1, C R Margules, D W Hilbert

  • 1Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.

Journal of Biosciences
|August 15, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Prioritizing biodiversity protection areas requires comparable data on species and environmental features. This study reviews data sources and methods to minimize bias for effective conservation planning.

More Related Videos

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
04:44

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Published on: July 21, 2021

Scanning Dos and Don'ts: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Children Aged 3 to 5 Years to Assess Brain Structure and Function
07:31

Scanning Dos and Don'ts: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Children Aged 3 to 5 Years to Assess Brain Structure and Function

Published on: March 10, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
08:10

Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa

Published on: February 2, 2018

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
04:44

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Published on: July 21, 2021

Scanning Dos and Don'ts: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Children Aged 3 to 5 Years to Assess Brain Structure and Function
07:31

Scanning Dos and Don'ts: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Children Aged 3 to 5 Years to Assess Brain Structure and Function

Published on: March 10, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Conservation Biology
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Effective biodiversity protection relies on accurate data for candidate areas.
  • Data quality and comparability are crucial for prioritizing conservation sites.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify suitable data sources for biodiversity prioritization.
  • To review methods for addressing data quality issues like bias.

Main Methods:

  • Examined data from museums, herbariums, and resource management agencies.
  • Discussed issues of data precision, accuracy, and sampling bias.
  • Reviewed data treatment methods to mitigate bias.

Main Results:

  • Museums, herbariums, and agencies are key data sources.
  • Data quality varies, necessitating bias assessment.
  • Methods exist to improve data comparability for conservation planning.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized, high-quality data are essential for robust biodiversity prioritization.
  • Addressing data limitations is critical for successful conservation outcomes.