Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risk-based evaluation of postmortem inspection procedures for pigs in Australia.

D R Hamilton1, P Gallas, L Lyall

  • 1Australian Quarantine Inspection Service, Adelaide, South Australia.

The Veterinary Record
|August 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Traditional and risk-based pork inspection methods show similar consumer protection levels. While risk-based methods missed more abnormalities, overall foodborne hazard exposure remained comparable between the two systems.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pathogenesis of proliferative enteropathy caused by Lawsoniaintracellularis.

Journal of comparative pathology·2026
Same author

Factors Affecting Adherence, Intake, and Perceived Palatability of Oral Nutritional Supplements: A Literature Review.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2022
Same author

Drain-free neck dissection: the use of Artiss fibrin sealant.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2022
Same author

Carriage of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae on common insect vectors.

Veterinary microbiology·2022
Same author

Electrochemotherapy for the palliative management of non-skin-origin head and neck cancer: case series and UK national survey.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

The relation between stimulated salivary flow and the temporal consumption experience of a liquid oral nutritional supplement.

Appetite·2021

Area of Science:

  • Food Safety
  • Veterinary Public Health
  • Meat Inspection

Background:

  • Traditional postmortem inspection relies on visual and incision methods.
  • Risk-based inspection utilizes visual assessment to identify potential hazards.
  • Evaluating inspection efficacy is crucial for ensuring meat product safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of traditional and risk-based postmortem inspection procedures in pigs.
  • To assess the non-detection rates of abnormalities and microbiological contamination.
  • To determine the impact of inspection methods on consumer protection regarding foodborne hazards.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of traditional (incision) and risk-based (visual) inspection methods on approximately 30,000 pigs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of performance characteristics: non-detection rates of abnormalities, microbiological contamination, lymph node association with condemnation, and finished product standards.
  • Analysis of contamination rates with foodborne hazards (Salmonella, Yersinia) and other carcase contamination parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • Risk-based inspection had higher non-detection rates for abscessation (19%) and arthritis (39%) compared to traditional methods (6% and 28%, respectively).
    • Despite higher undetected abnormalities in risk-based inspection, overall consumer protection levels were similar.
    • No significant differences in Salmonella and Yersinia contamination rates were found between the two methods for pre-chill carcases and retail products.

    Conclusions:

    • Both traditional and risk-based pork inspection systems offer comparable consumer protection against foodborne hazards.
    • The increased potential exposure from undetected abnormalities in risk-based inspection is insignificant compared to contamination from normal tissues.
    • Further research into optimizing meat inspection protocols for enhanced food safety is warranted.