Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

05:39
Shock Wave Application to Cell Cultures
Published on: April 9, 2014
Pressure-release versus rigid reflector for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Achim M Loske1, Fernando E Prieto
1Centro de Física Applicada y Technología Avanzada, UNAM, Querétaro, Mexico. loske@fisica.unam.mx
Journal of Endourology
|August 20, 2002
Summary
A new pressure-release reflector shows promise for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), potentially improving patient safety while maintaining effective kidney stone fragmentation.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Urology
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is a common procedure for kidney stone treatment.
- Conventional rigid reflectors are used to focus shockwaves in electrohydraulic lithotripters.
- Improving the safety and efficacy of SWL remains an area of active research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of a novel pressure-release reflector against a traditional rigid reflector for shockwave concentration in SWL.
- To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each reflector type in terms of stone fragmentation and pressure dynamics.
Main Methods:
- A pressure-release reflector made of polyurethane foam was designed and tested.
- Shockwaves were generated using an electrohydraulic lithotripter with both reflector types.
- Kidney stone models were used to assess fragmentation, and pressure measurements were recorded.
Main Results:
- The pressure-release reflector resulted in less residual stone weight when fragments were screened through a 3.0 x 3.0-mm mesh.
- The rigid reflector achieved less residual fragment weight with smaller mesh sizes (1.0 x 1.0-mm and 0.6 x 0.6-mm).
Conclusions:
- Pressure-release reflectors offer a potential alternative for SWL, balancing stone fragmentation with enhanced patient safety.
- Further consideration of pressure-release reflectors in SWL devices is warranted.

