Related Experiment Videos
Reading systematic reviews
1University of Melbourne, Ballarat Health Services, Victoria.
Background:
While systematic reviews should be of assistance in decision making, currently many reviews are unreliable, poorly reported or not clinically useful. It is therefore important that they are read critically.
Objectives:
The objective is to provide a logical way to appraise systematic reviews. Particular objectives are to demonstrate how to use a validated general guide for appraising systematic reviews; amend the guide so that it can be used to appraise systematic reviews of controlled trials, prognostic studies and studies evaluating diagnostic tests; choose between discordant reviews and assess the usefulness of good systematic reviews.
Discussion:
Guidelines for undertaking and reporting systematic reviews should eventually improve their quality and usefulness. In the meantime, reviews must be appraised critically, particularly those outside the Cochrane Library.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blind Procedures
Group Design
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
The Scientific Method
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...