Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2026

Noninvasive Sampling of Mucosal Lining Fluid for the Quantification of In Vivo Upper Airway Immune-mediator Levels
Published on: August 7, 2017
Parental farming protects children against atopy: longitudinal evidence involving skin prick tests
F Horak1, M Studnicka, C Gartner
1University Children's Hospital, vienna, Austria.
Background:
There is growing evidence that the development of allergic sensitization can be influenced by environmental co-factors. Studies showed that growing up on a farm can protect children against allergic sensitization. However, little is known whether this 'farming effect' can only be observed in early lifetime or whether it also plays a role in later childhood.
Objective:
The aim of our study was to test whether a farming environment is negatively associated with a new occurrence of skin prick test (SPT) positivity in school children. As a secondary outcome we investigated whether children living on a farm lose their allergic sensitization more frequently than other children.
Methods:
In a longitudinal design, 1150 elementary school children (mean age 7.8 years, SD 0.7) were recruited from nine different areas of Austria in 1994. A questionnaire and an SPT involving seven common aero-allergens were performed at study entry and at follow-up 3 years later.
Results:
A total of 844 children, who underwent two SPTs, were included in the analyses; 15.1% of their families reported working on a farm. Adjusting for potential confounders (parental education, number of siblings, sex, family history of allergy), parental farming was inversely related to the prevalence and new occurrence of SPT positivity [no farming 12.2%, part-time farming 6%, full-time farming 2.2% incidence; odds ratio (OR) farming vs. non-farming 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.98]. Furthermore, children living in a farming environment were more likely to lose their SPT positivity during follow-up (no farming 14.6%, part-time farming 50%, full-time farming 60% loss of sensitization; OR farming vs. non-farming 8.06; 95% CI 2.05-31.75). No difference in the pattern of sensitization to specific allergens could be observed between farming and non-farming children.
Conclusion:
A farming environment has a strong negative effect on the development of allergic sensitization. Furthermore, the study provides evidence that atopic children living on a farm lose their SPT positivity more frequently than children from non-farming environments.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Cross-reactivity

