On the limits of anisochrony in pulse attribution
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2026

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
Published on: March 16, 2015
1Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Box 1225, 751 42 Uppsala, Sweden. guy.madison@psyk.uu.se
Abstract:
Pulse is the subjective experience of isochrony, which is typically elicited by series of sensory events with close to isochronous spacing, as is common in music and poetry. We measured the amount of anisochrony in a 10-event sequence with 570- to 630-ms nominal inter-onset intervals (IOI) that corresponded to the threshold for pulse attribution. This threshold was 8.6% of the IOI across 28 participants with a wide range of musical training, as compared with 3.5% for detection of anisochrony in the same kind of sequence. Musical training led to lower thresholds for detection of irregularity but had no effect on pulse attribution. The relatively larger amount of anisochrony in pulse attribution may reflect the limit for predicting and synchronising with future events. We suggest that this limit reflects a compromise between tolerance for naturally occurring deviations and the need for precision in timing.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:

