Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Twelve tips for undertaking a systematic review.

Scott Reeves1, Ivan Koppel, Hugh Barr

  • 1Institute of Health Sciences, City University, London, UK. S.Reeves-1@city.ac.uk

Medical Teacher
|August 24, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Agreement and utility between registry and trial mortality data - a data utility comparison in the BOSS trial.

Trials·2026
Same author

Reply.

Gastroenterology·2025
Same author

Palliative care and assisted dying: An Australian experience that these can become accustomed bedfellows.

Palliative medicine·2025
Same author

Lessons learned from the BOSS trial.

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2025
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of Regular Surveillance Versus Endoscopy at Need for Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: Economic Evaluation Alongside the Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance Study (BOSS) Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gastroenterology·2025
Same author

Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance Versus Endoscopy at Need Study (BOSS): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gastroenterology·2025
Same journal

Determinants of authentic responses to medical student wellbeing surveys: An interpretive description study.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Response to: "Turning struggles into strengths: A qualitative exploration of academic difficulty in medical school".

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Self-regulated learning and academic success in health professions students: A systematic review.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

A response to: 'the hallucination of learning with generative artificial intelligence'.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Beyond "student-led": Toward an entrustment framework for faculty involvement in student-led OSCEs.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

When what we can count is all that counts.

Medical teacher·2026
See all related articles

Systematic reviews are crucial for evidence-based health and education. This paper guides researchers and practitioners on conducting systematic reviews, particularly for interprofessional education research.

Area of Science:

  • Health Sciences
  • Education Research
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Growing need for robust evidence in health and education sectors.
  • Systematic review as a key methodology for synthesizing research.
  • Importance of understanding research impact on practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Provide guidance for systematic review researchers.
  • Offer practical advice for practitioners engaging in systematic reviews.
  • Share insights from 5 years of interprofessional education systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • Critical appraisal of research literature.
  • Synthesis of findings from multiple studies.
  • Focus on interprofessional education as a case study.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identification of best practices in systematic review conduct.
  • Highlighting common challenges and solutions in systematic reviews.
  • Demonstrating the value of systematic reviews for informing practice.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic reviews are essential for advancing evidence-based practice in health and education.
  • Effective systematic reviews require rigorous methodology and critical assessment.
  • Guidance provided can enhance the quality and impact of future systematic reviews.