Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frequency mapping in cochlear implants.

Qian-Jie Fu1, Robert V Shannon

  • 1Department of Auditory Implants and Perception, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California 90057, USA.

Ear and Hearing
|August 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Talker Sex Differences on Binaural Summation in Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Binaural Processing Is Key to Tonal-Language Benefits and Right-Ear Advantage for Segregation of Competing Speech.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Factors affecting binaural fusion in cochlear implant users.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Speech Perception in Noise: Do Children Hear Their Peers Differently Than Adults?

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Editorial: Changes in the auditory brain following deafness, cochlear implantation, and auditory training, volume III.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025
Same author

Binaural fusion in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.

Cochlear implants international·2025
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Cochlear implant users

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) are vital for hearing restoration in severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.
  • The Nucleus-22 CI system utilizes a Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS) strategy for sound processing.
  • Optimizing the frequency-to-electrode mapping is crucial for improving speech perception in CI users.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the acute effects of varying frequency-to-electrode mapping parameters on phoneme identification in Nucleus-22 CI listeners.
  • To determine how filter slope, distribution, and bandwidth impact speech recognition.

Main Methods:

  • Five Nucleus-22 CI listeners participated in the study.
  • Custom four-channel CIS processors were used, with speech signals filtered into four broad frequency bands.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Phoneme recognition was assessed by systematically varying band-pass filter slope, frequency distribution (logarithmic to linear), and bandwidth (0.2 to 2 octaves).

    • Main Results:

    • Filter slope had minimal impact on vowel and consonant recognition, except for a slight drop at the shallowest slope.
    • Filter distribution significantly affected vowel recognition, with logarithmic mapping yielding best performance.
    • Filter bandwidth moderately affected recognition; broad bandwidths impaired vowel scores, while narrow bandwidths affected consonant scores.

    Conclusions:

    • Phoneme recognition in four-channel CIS is mildly affected by filter slope but significantly by filter distribution and bandwidth.
    • A logarithmic frequency distribution optimizes speech recognition.
    • Vowels are sensitive to broad bandwidths, and consonants to narrow bandwidths.