Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Geographic delivery models for radiotherapy services.

Gisele H Roberts1, Peter B Dunscombe, Rajiv S Samant

  • 1North-eastern Ontario Regional Cancer Centre, Canada Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada.

Australasian Radiology
|August 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.

Medical physics·2016
Same author

Development of a residency program in radiation oncology physics: an inverse planning approach.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2016
Same author

Is tissue harmonic ultrasound imaging (THI) of the prostatic urethra and rectum superior to brightness (B) mode imaging? An observer study.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2014
Same author

Recommended ethics curriculum for medical physics graduate and residency programs: report of Task Group 159.

Medical physics·2010
Same author

A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2008
Same author

Quality assurance needs for modern image-based radiotherapy: recommendations from 2007 interorganizational symposium on "quality assurance of radiation therapy: challenges of advanced technology".

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2008
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Centralized radiotherapy delivery creates the highest patient costs, impacting access in both urban and rural settings. While technology can improve access, maintaining professional competence in distributed models remains a challenge.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Economics
  • Radiotherapy Delivery Systems

Background:

  • Radiotherapy access is crucial for cancer care, but delivery models vary in cost and patient burden.
  • Understanding the societal costs of different radiotherapy formats is essential for equitable healthcare.
  • Previous studies have not fully quantified the patient-specific financial impediments across diverse populations and delivery models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the societal costs associated with radiotherapy delivery in urban and rural populations.
  • To identify and measure the impediments to accessing radiotherapy services.
  • To compare the financial burdens imposed by centralized, distributed comprehensive, and satellite radiotherapy models.

Main Methods:

  • Decomposition of radiotherapy costs into institutional, productivity, and geographical components.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of idealized urban and rural population scenarios.
  • Quantification of patient financial burden, including travel and indirect costs.

    • Main Results:

    • Centralized radiotherapy delivery models present the highest financial burden for patients in both urban and rural settings.
    • Patient travel costs represent a significant component of the overall impediment to radiotherapy access.
    • Distributed models show potential for enhanced patient access through remote monitoring, but raise concerns about professional competence.

    Conclusions:

    • The financial burden on patients is a key factor limiting radiotherapy access, particularly with centralized models.
    • Technological advancements like remote monitoring can mitigate access barriers, but require careful implementation.
    • Ensuring professional competence in distributed radiotherapy services is critical for maintaining quality of care.