Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: components of cognitive processing.

S Loring-Meier1, D F Halpern

  • 1Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|August 30, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stereotypes and steroids: using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences.

Brain and cognition·2001
Same author

Mapping cognitive processes onto the brain: mind the gap.

Brain and cognition·2000
Same author

Handedness and sex differences in intelligence: evidence from the medical college admission test.

Brain and cognition·1998
Same author

Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring.

The American psychologist·1998
Same author

Sex differences in intelligence. Implications for education.

The American psychologist·1997
Same author

The correlates of left-handedness: moderating variables in the epidemiology of left-handedness.

Annals of epidemiology·1997
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Males exhibit faster processing speeds in visuospatial working memory tasks, particularly those involving image transformation. These findings highlight processing speed as a key factor in understanding sex differences in spatial cognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Sex differences in visuospatial tasks are well-documented, varying by task type.
  • Males often show advantages in tasks requiring visuospatial working memory transformations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the cognitive components underlying sex differences in visuospatial working memory.
  • Identify specific components contributing to observed male advantages.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized laboratory tasks assessing four components: image generation, maintenance, scanning, and transformation.
  • Measured response times and accuracy across tasks.

Main Results:

  • Males demonstrated significantly faster response times across all four visuospatial working memory tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • No significant differences in accuracy were observed between sexes.

    • Conclusions:

    • Processing speed is a critical factor explaining sex differences in visuospatial working memory.
    • Findings have implications for understanding performance on real-world spatial tasks.