Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

An In Vitro Model of a Parallel-Plate Perfusion System to Study Bacterial Adherence to Graft Tissues
Published on: January 7, 2019
[Infectious endocarditis: degree of discordance between clinical guidelines recommendations and clinical practice]
Mercedes González De Molina1, Juan C Fernández-Guerrero, José Azpitarte
1Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Insights
Clinical guidelines for infectious endocarditis are not consistently followed in practice, with a 30.5% discordance rate observed. This gap impacts patient outcomes and highlights the need for improved adherence to established protocols.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Practice Research
Background:
- Infectious endocarditis requires adherence to clinical guidelines for optimal patient management.
- Variations between guideline recommendations and clinical practice can impact disease progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the discordance between clinical guidelines and actual practice in infectious endocarditis care.
- To assess the impact of this discordance on patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 34 native valve endocarditis patients over 4 years.
- Discordance calculated by comparing patient data against 15 guideline-recommended actions across four care phases.
- A scoring system evaluated errors in pre-diagnosis, diagnosis, antibiotic, and surgical treatment phases.
Main Results:
- A mean discordance of 30.5% (range 0-66%) was found between guideline recommendations and clinical practice.
- Higher discordance scores (over six points) correlated with unfavorable patient evolution.
Conclusions:
- Current adherence to infectious endocarditis clinical guidelines is insufficient.
- Improving adherence to guidelines is crucial for better patient care and outcomes in infectious endocarditis.
Introduction And Objectives:
The present study was made to investigate the degree of discordance between the recommendations of clinical guidelines and actual practice in the care of patients with infectious endocarditis.
Material And Methods:
Data was gathered on 34 patients that were admitted to our hospital for native valve infection over a 4-year period. The degree of discordance (%) was obtained by comparing each clinical history with a catalog of 15 specific actions recommended in the clinical guidelines for four consecutive phases: pre-diagnosis, hospital diagnosis, antibiotic treatment, and surgical treatment. A system was constructed, scoring each phase with the greatest detected error (on a severity scale of 0 to 8 points) and adding together the scores for the four phases.
Results:
The mean degree of discordance was 30.5% (range, 0-66%). Scores of more than six points were clearly associated with an unfavourable evolution.
Conclusions:
The recommendations of clinical guidelines for infectious endocarditis are inadequately followed in practice, which can affect the course of the disease. It is necessary to increase adherence to clinical guidelines in practice, in order to improve the care of patients with this serious disease.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

