Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Intratracheal Instillation of Stem Cells in Term Neonatal Rats
Published on: May 4, 2020
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity
Alice H Johnson1, Janet L Peacock, Anne Greenough
1Department of Child Health, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Insights
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation show similar outcomes for very preterm infants. Early respiratory support with either method did not significantly reduce mortality or chronic lung disease in this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Respiratory Care
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Uncertainty exists regarding the comparative safety and efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) versus conventional ventilation (CV) for respiratory support in very preterm infants.
- A multicenter trial was initiated to evaluate if early HFOV intervention could decrease mortality and chronic lung disease in newborns with gestational age ≤28 weeks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation against conventional ventilation in reducing mortality and chronic lung disease in very preterm infants.
- To assess secondary outcomes including treatment failure, serious brain injury, and air leak.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving preterm infants with gestational ages from 23 to 28 weeks.
- Infants were assigned to either HFOV or CV within one hour of birth, with stratification by center and gestational age (23-25 weeks or 26-28 weeks).
Main Results:
- The composite outcome of death or chronic lung disease occurred in 66% of infants receiving HFOV and 68% receiving CV (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.89-1.08).
- No significant differences were observed between HFOV and CV groups for the primary outcome, secondary outcomes, treatment failure, serious brain injury, or air leak.
Conclusions:
- Early use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation yields comparable results for the initial treatment of respiratory issues in very preterm infants.
- Further follow-up studies are necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these ventilation strategies.
Background:
There remains uncertainty concerning the safety and efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with those of conventional ventilation for the respiratory support of very preterm infants. We conducted a multicenter trial to determine whether early intervention with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation reduced mortality and the incidence of chronic lung disease among newborns with a gestational age of 28 weeks or less.
Methods:
We randomly assigned preterm infants with a gestational age of 23 to 28 weeks to either conventional ventilation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation within one hour after birth. Randomization was stratified according to center and gestational age (23 to 25 weeks or 26 to 28 weeks).
Results:
A total of 400 infants were assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, and 397 were assigned to conventional ventilation. The composite primary outcome (death or chronic lung disease, diagnosed at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age) occurred in 66 percent of the infants assigned to receive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and 68 percent of those in the conventional-ventilation group (relative risk in the group assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, 0.98; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.08). Similar proportions of infants died or had chronic lung disease in each gestational-age group. In both treatment groups treatment failure occurred in 10 percent of infants (relative risk in the group assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, 0.99; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.50). There were no significant differences between the groups in a range of other secondary outcome measures, including serious brain injury and air leak.
Conclusions:
The results obtained with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation do not differ significantly in the early treatment of respiratory disease in very preterm infants. Assessment of long-term effects will require additional follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease I: Introduction

