Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the cochlea, a...
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phenomenology of the stream of thought: dissociable dynamic dimensions revealed through experience sampling.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Are emotional stimuli prioritised in visual awareness?

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

Attentional selection and communication through coherence: Scope and limitations.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

Stochastic resonance in the sensory systems and its applications in neural prosthetics.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Does stochastic resonance improve performance for individuals with higher autism-spectrum quotient?

Frontiers in neuroscience·2023
Same author

Qualia and Phenomenal Consciousness Arise From the Information Structure of an Electromagnetic Field in the Brain.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2022
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 12, 2010

Auditory frequency-based inhibition differs from spatial IOR.

David J Prime1, Lawrence M Ward

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. dprime@interchange.ubc.ca

Perception & Psychophysics
|August 31, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Uninformative auditory frequency cues usually help reaction time, but can sometimes hinder it. This study shows these inhibitory effects differ from spatial inhibition of return, suggesting distinct processing mechanisms.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 12, 2010

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Uninformative auditory frequency cues can facilitate target detection and discrimination.
  • However, inhibitory effects can occur at longer cue-target intervals.
  • These inhibitory effects have been observed in specific experimental paradigms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the conditions under which auditory frequency cues induce inhibitory effects.
  • To differentiate frequency-based inhibitory effects from spatial inhibition of return (IOR).
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms of auditory cueing effects.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted target-target and go-no-go cue-target experiments.
  • Compared results with a paradigm previously showing inhibitory effects (Mondor et al., 1998).
  • Varied cue-target similarity in Experiment 3.

Main Results:

  • Inhibitory effects were absent in target-target and go-no-go paradigms.
  • Inhibitory effects were present in the Mondor et al. (1998) paradigm, irrespective of cue-target similarity.
  • Frequency-based inhibitory effects were empirically distinguished from spatial IOR.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory frequency-based inhibition is distinct from spatial inhibition of return.
  • Different neural and functional mechanisms likely underlie these two types of inhibition.
  • The findings contribute to understanding auditory processing and attention.