[Distal radius fractures and concomitant lesions. Experimental studies concerning the pathomechanism]

Since Colles (1814) first described a distal radius fracture and the publication by Dupuytren (1834), the frequency of and problems surrounding these fractures were increasingly recognised. Not only the treatment but also the formation and type of fracture were repeatedly analysed. The various theories concerning the pathomechanism led to names such as: "tear fracture", "bend fracture", "thrust fracture", "compression fracture", "snap fracture" and others. In our experimental studies we attempted to simulate the pathomechanism of distal radius fractures and present them pictorially. With the help of a materials testing machine, 63 prepared cadaver arms were hyperextended in the wrist joint until a radius fracture occurred. The concomitant lesions were registered radiologically and by dissection. Moreover, additional cadaver arms were deep-frozen and examined by means of computer tomography and cryosection according to Kathrein. Through experimental hyperextension it was possible to generate dorsal, central, and palmar types of fractures. We produced 42 dorsal, 14 central and 7 palmar fractures. Fundamentally, it seems that the fracture depends on the extent in which the carpal bones of the proximal row are pressed against the dorsal, central or palmar part of the articular surface of the distal radius. The subsequent dissection showed in 40 cases (63 %) mostly multiple concomitant lesions and in 23 cases (37 %) none of these. The reason for concomitant lesions may be the proportion of bone stability to the strength of ligaments. Most frequently (27 cases, i.e. 43 %), we found a destabilisation of the articular disk with or without a bony avulsion fragment (fracture of the ulnar styloid). We also commonly found ruptures of the interosseous ligaments between scaphoid and lunate (20 cases, i.e. 32 %) and lunate and triquetrum (11 cases, i.e. 18 %). It is difficult to apply knowledge gained from experimental studies on preserved cadaver arms clinically. There are of course no physiological reflexes and the slow fracture process must be taken into consideration. This holds true not only for concomitant lesions but also for the type of fracture. On the other hand, in these experimental studies it was possible to generate many realistic types of fractures with their concomitant lesions.