Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Resuscitating an idea: prone CPR.

John A Stewart1

  • 1Swedish Medical Center, 747 Broadway, 98122, Seattle, WA, USA. jastewart@defib.net

Resuscitation
|September 3, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may offer advantages over traditional methods. Further research is recommended to explore its effectiveness in improving survival rates for cardiac arrest patients.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correspondence: On the "2-minute rule".

Resuscitation plus·2025
Same author

The elephant in the room: In-hospital resuscitation research is impeded by flawed time data.

Resuscitation plus·2025
Same author

Letter by Stewart Regarding Article, "In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival in the United States During and After the Initial Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Surge".

Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes·2022
Same author

In-hospital resuscitation of Covid-19 patients is impeded by serious delays, but the problem is obscured by poor time data.

European heart journal·2021
Same author

Judging Futility of Resuscitation Attempts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Requires Better Time Data.

Critical care medicine·2021
Same author

ILCOR's revised Covid-19 defibrillation recommendation requires a new approach to training.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2020

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Resuscitation Science

Background:

  • Traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has seen minimal changes in 40 years.
  • Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates remain low despite extensive training.
  • Existing CPR methods face challenges in training and bystander performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as a potential alternative to traditional CPR.
  • To highlight the advantages of prone CPR, including simplified training and increased bystander intervention.
  • To advocate for prioritizing research into the effectiveness of prone CPR.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on prone CPR.
  • Analysis of supporting studies and case reports.
  • Comparison of prone CPR with traditional CPR methods.

Main Results:

  • Prone CPR offers potential advantages over traditional CPR.
  • Simpler training and increased likelihood of bystander performance are key benefits.
  • Supporting studies and case reports suggest efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • Prone CPR warrants further investigation as a potentially superior resuscitation technique.
  • Research into prone CPR effectiveness should be a high priority.
  • This method may improve outcomes for cardiac arrest victims.

Related Experiment Videos