Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.

Petra Macaskill1, Stephen D Walter, Les Irwig

  • 1Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006. petram@health.usyd.edu.au

Statistics in Medicine
|September 3, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HPV Testing Versus Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women 50 Years and Older: Evidence From the HPV FOCAL Randomized Controlled Trial.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Diversity, equity, and inclusion as scientific rigor: progress during challenging times.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Diversity, equity, and inclusion as scientific rigor: progress during challenging times.

JNCI cancer spectrum·2026
Same author

Impact of switching from a quadrivalent to a nonavalent HPV vaccine on HPV infections and cervical cancer in Colombia: a mathematical modelling study.

Lancet regional health. Americas·2026
Same author

HPV Prevalence Among Inuit Women in Northern Quebec, Canada: A Pre- and Post-Vaccination Analysis.

Journal of lower genital tract disease·2026
Same author

Correction: ​​Enhancing the sensitivity of non-invasive cervical cancer detection using CpG methylation haplotype profiling.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Combining diagnostic tests involves a sensitivity and specificity trade-off. Likelihood ratios help compare combined tests, guiding decisions on optimal diagnostic strategies, as shown with Pap and HPV testing.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Combining diagnostic tests often presents a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity.
  • Likelihood ratios are crucial for evaluating diagnostic test performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for comparing combined diagnostic tests with component tests using likelihood ratios.
  • To provide a framework for deciding on the utility of combined testing strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing likelihood ratios to account for sensitivity and specificity trade-offs.
  • Employing a graphical approach to assess test superiority.
  • Deriving asymptotic standard errors for paired study designs.
  • Analyzing the trade-off in true and false positive/negative results.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Likelihood ratios effectively compare combined and component diagnostic tests.
  • A graphical method visually assesses test performance superiority.
  • Methods are demonstrated using the combined Pap and HPV testing example.

Conclusions:

  • Likelihood ratios offer a clinically relevant way to compare diagnostic tests and their combinations.
  • The methods aid in deciding when combined testing is advantageous, even with trade-offs.