Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interhemispheric communication of abstract and specific visual-form information.

Chad J Marsolek1, Christopher D Nicholas, David R Andresen

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis 55455, USA. chad.j.marsolek-1@umn.edu

Neuropsychologia
|September 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do cerebral motivational asymmetries mediate the relationship between handedness and personality?

Laterality·2021
Same author

Medical Errors in Iowa: Prevalence and Patients' Perspectives.

Journal of patient safety·2018
Same author

Can dogs use vocal intonation as a social referencing cue in an object choice task?

Animal cognition·2018
Same author

Conflicting demands of abstract and specific visual object processing resolved by frontoparietal networks.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2016
Same author

Separability of abstract-category and specific-exemplar visual object subsystems: evidence from fMRI pattern analysis.

Brain and cognition·2014
Same author

Implicit memory influences on metamemory during verbal learning after traumatic brain injury.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2014
Same journal

Identifying Networks within an fMRI Multivariate Searchlight Analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From Past Recall to Future Projection: What Does Verb Tense Production Reveal About Mental Time Travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Eye Movement Measures of Word-Level and Text-Level Fluency in Disordered Reading: A Comparison of Schizophrenia and Dyslexia.

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Comparing letters across hemispheres (AH) improved abstract category identification. However, within-hemisphere (WH) processing enhanced specific exemplar recognition, especially for visually similar letters.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • The brain processes visual information using distinct hemispheres.
  • Interhemispheric communication can influence cognitive task performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how visual field (across-hemispheres vs. within-hemisphere) affects abstract category versus specific-exemplar letter comparisons.
  • To determine if different visual processing subsystems are differentially affected by interhemispheric transfer.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed abstract-category and specific-exemplar letter comparison tasks.
  • Stimuli were presented either within the same visual field (WH) or across different visual fields (AH).
  • The reversed association technique confirmed the independence of comparison subsystems.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Higher accuracy in AH trials for abstract-category comparisons.
  • Higher accuracy in WH trials for specific-exemplar comparisons, particularly with visually similar exemplars.
  • Evidence suggests distinct subsystems for abstract and specific comparisons.

Conclusions:

  • Abstract category processing is less impaired by interhemispheric transfer than specific-exemplar processing.
  • The findings support a dual-subsystem model for visual letter recognition.
  • Visual field effects depend on the nature of the comparison task (abstract vs. specific).