SWOG-9510: evaluation of topotecan in hormone refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study

Catherine E Klein1, Catherine M Tangen, Thomas J Braun

  • 1University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA. catherine.klein@med.va.gov

The Prostate
|September 5, 2002
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study found that topotecan infusions are ineffective for treating hormone-refractory prostate cancer. The new agent did not show tumor responses and had significant hematologic toxicities in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Oncology
  • Prostate Cancer Research

Background:

  • Prostate cancer is a leading malignancy in men, often progressing to metastatic disease.
  • Hormone therapy is a common initial treatment, but resistance eventually develops.
  • There is a critical need for novel therapeutic agents for advanced prostate cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topotecan in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
  • To determine if topotecan can provide a clinical benefit in patients who have failed prior androgen deprivation therapies.

Main Methods:

  • A Phase II clinical trial was conducted.
  • Patients received continuous intravenous infusions of topotecan at 0.5 mg/m(2)/day for 21 days every 28 days.
  • Eligibility criteria included failure of one or two prior androgen ablative therapies.

Main Results:

  • Twenty-six patients were enrolled; no confirmed tumor responses were observed.
  • The median survival for the study population was 9 months.
  • Hematologic toxicity was the most common adverse event, with 8 of 24 assessable patients experiencing Grade 4 toxicity.

Conclusions:

  • Topotecan, administered as a continuous intravenous infusion at the tested dose, is ineffective for managing hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
  • The observed toxicities, particularly hematologic, raise concerns about the tolerability of this regimen.
  • Further investigation into topotecan for prostate cancer is not supported by these findings.