Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.

Thomas Lumley1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Box 357232, Seattle, WA 98195-7232, USA. tlumley@u.washington.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|September 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing Treatment Effects in Observational Data With Missing Confounders: A Comparative Study of Practical Doubly-Robust and Traditional Missing Data Methods.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Analysis approaches to combine error-prone data with a subset of validated data: an application to a multinational study of Kaposi sarcoma and HIV.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Using a 'one strain-many compounds' approach to screen a collection of diverse fungi from Aotearoa New Zealand for antibacterial activity against <i>Escherichia coli</i>.

Microbiology (Reading, England)·2026
Same author

Optimum Allocation for Adaptive Multi-Wave Sampling in R: The R Package optimall.

Journal of statistical software·2025
Same author

Data validation in multinational observational studies with error-prone data: applying an optimal validation sampling strategy in a study of Kaposi sarcoma and HIV.

American journal of epidemiology·2025

This study introduces network meta-analysis to compare treatments indirectly. These methods assess treatment effectiveness and evidence consistency, using linear mixed models for acute myocardial infarction therapies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Evidence synthesis
  • Comparative effectiveness research

Background:

  • Direct head-to-head randomized trials are not always available for all treatment comparisons.
  • Existing evidence may involve multiple treatments compared against common or different comparators.
  • Synthesizing indirect evidence is crucial for comprehensive treatment evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present methods for assessing the relative effectiveness of treatments using indirect comparisons.
  • To introduce techniques for estimating treatment effect heterogeneity and evidence inconsistency.
  • To apply these methods to a meta-analysis of acute myocardial infarction treatments.

Main Methods:

  • Network meta-analysis techniques were employed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Estimation of heterogeneity in treatment effects was performed.
  • Assessment of inconsistency (incoherence) in the evidence network was conducted.
  • A simple estimation procedure using linear mixed models was utilized.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed methods allow for the estimation of relative treatment effectiveness from indirect evidence.
    • Heterogeneity and inconsistency within the evidence network can be quantified.
    • The methods were successfully applied to a meta-analysis of treatments for acute myocardial infarction.

    Conclusions:

    • Network meta-analysis provides a robust framework for comparing treatments when direct evidence is lacking.
    • The presented methods offer a way to evaluate the reliability of synthesized evidence.
    • These techniques enhance the evidence base for clinical decision-making in conditions like acute myocardial infarction.