Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cement restriction technique in dynamic hip screw revisions.

A C Campbell1, S Sinha

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Monklands Hospital, Monkscourt Avenue, ML6 OJS, Scotland, Airdrie, UK. falconexergy@hotmail.com

Injury
|September 6, 2002
PubMed
Summary

This study addresses a common issue in hip revision surgery when moving from dynamic hip screw fixation to arthroplasty. The lag screw used in the initial procedure leaves a defect in the femur that can cause problems with cement containment during the revision. The authors recommend using a bioresorbable cement restrictor to block the defect and prevent cement leakage. The restrictor is placed in the defect before cement is injected, and it is later absorbed by the body. The method was found to be simple and effective in the described cases. The authors suggest that this technique may be a useful solution for improving cementation in similar surgical situations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rostrate pedicellariae: A morphologically distinct form of echinoid test appendage.

Journal of morphology·2018
Same author

Metal-on-metal surface hip arthroplasty in patients with abnormal Coxanatomy: preliminary results.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2017
Same author

An unfavourable outcome after periprosthetic fracture following metal-on-metal surface hip arthroplasty.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2017
Same author

Attitudes of farm consultants in the South Island of New Zealand towards the role of veterinarians in farm businesses.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2016
Same author

An active video game intervention does not improve physical activity and sedentary time of children at-risk for developmental coordination disorder: a crossover randomized trial.

Child: care, health and development·2015
Same author

Avulsion fracture of the coracoid process.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2010

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery techniques
  • Hip arthroplasty research
  • Surgical cementation methods

Background:

Hip revision surgery presents unique challenges when transitioning from dynamic hip screw fixation to arthroplasty. A known issue is the defect left by the lag screw in the proximal femur, which can compromise cement containment. Prior research has shown that sub-optimal cementation can lead to implant instability. This uncertainty drove the need for a reliable solution to manage cement distribution in such cases. No prior work had resolved the issue of cement leakage through lag screw defects. Existing methods often fail to address the irregular geometry of the femoral canal after screw removal. This gap motivated the exploration of alternative approaches to improve cement containment. The goal is to find a technique that is both simple and effective for routine clinical use.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to evaluate a method for improving cement containment during hip revision surgery. Specifically, the focus is on the defect left by the lag screw in the proximal femur. The problem arises when transitioning from dynamic hip screw fixation to arthroplasty. The motivation stems from the risk of sub-optimal cementation in these cases. The study seeks to introduce a solution that is both practical and reliable. The proposed method must be easy to implement in a clinical setting. The ultimate goal is to enhance the success rate of cemented hip arthroplasty revisions.

Keywords:
hip arthroplastycement containmentsurgical revisionfemoral defect

Frequently Asked Questions

The restrictor effectively prevents cement leakage through the lag screw defect in the proximal femur.

It is positioned in the defect left by the lag screw before cement injection to block cement flow.

The material is temporary and later absorbed by the body, avoiding the need for removal.

It acts as a physical barrier to prevent cement from escaping the femoral canal during implantation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The proposed method involves the use of a bioresorbable cement restrictor. This device is placed in the defect left by the lag screw in the proximal femur. The restrictor is designed to block the passage of cement during implantation. The technique is intended to be simple and adaptable to standard surgical workflows. No specialized equipment is required beyond the restrictor itself. The method relies on the physical properties of the bioresorbable material. The restrictor is positioned before cement injection to prevent leakage. The approach is evaluated based on its effectiveness in containing cement within the femoral canal.

Main Results:

The use of a bioresorbable cement restrictor was found to be effective in containing cement during hip revision surgery. The restrictor successfully blocked cement from leaking through the lag screw defect. This led to improved cementation in the proximal femur. The method was reported to be simple and easy to implement. No complications were noted in the described cases. The restrictor provided a temporary barrier that was later absorbed by the body. The results suggest that this technique enhances the quality of cementation. The approach is recommended as a practical solution for this specific surgical challenge.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the use of a bioresorbable cement restrictor is a viable solution for cement containment in hip revision surgery. The technique was reported to be simple and effective in the described cases. The restrictor successfully prevented cement leakage through the lag screw defect. The method is recommended for use in similar surgical scenarios. The findings suggest that this approach improves the quality of cementation. The authors suggest that this technique may be adopted in routine clinical practice. The study does not claim that this is the only solution available. The results are based on the described application of the restrictor.

The method was reported to be effective with no complications noted in the described cases.

They propose that the method may be adopted in routine clinical practice for similar surgical scenarios.