Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What very small numbers mean.

Dale J Cohen1, Jennifer M Ferrell, Nathan Johnson

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 28403-3297, USA. cohend@uncwil.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|September 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictors of meniscal pathology in paediatric chronic anterior cruciate ligament tears: a case-control study.

The Knee·2026
Same author

The impact paradox: mixed-methods evaluation of National Institute of Health and Care Research funding for intellectual disability research in the UK.

BJPsych open·2026
Same author

Testosterone, cortisol, and fNIRS-based cortical activation associated with competitive task persistence and difficulty.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2026
Same author

Is value perceived? Evidence from perceptual grouping in value-based choice.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Radiofrequency cascade readout of coupled spin qubits.

Nature electronics·2026
Same author

Democratizing climate change mitigation pathways using modernized stabilization wedges.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a framework to understand number interpretation biases. Experiments show people exhibit perceptual and numerical biases when converting between relative frequencies, decimals, and dot displays for low proportions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Numerical Cognition

Background:

  • Understanding numerical cognition is crucial for interpreting data accurately.
  • Biases in number interpretation can lead to significant errors in decision-making.
  • Existing research often focuses on higher proportions, leaving low proportions understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and test a framework for assessing biases in number interpretation.
  • To investigate how individuals convert between different representations of low proportions (below 1%).
  • To identify specific types of biases, including perceptual, response, and numerical transformation biases.

Main Methods:

  • A theoretical and experimental framework was established.
  • Participants converted quantities between numerical labels (relative frequencies, decimals) and inherent displays (dots).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Five experiments focused on proportions below 1% using these varied representations.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants demonstrated significant perceptual biases.
    • Response biases were observed during quantity conversion tasks.
    • Numerical transformation biases were evident across different representation formats.
    • Data suggest distinct abstract representations for relative frequencies and decimals.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed framework effectively identifies biases in number interpretation.
    • Low proportions present unique challenges and biases in numerical cognition.
    • Relative frequencies and decimals may evoke different cognitive representations of quantity.