Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cemented cup revisions.

Charles L Nelson1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia 19104-4283, USA.

American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)
|September 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insights into Evolving Trends and Controversies in Orthopaedic Surgery from the ABOS Case Collection System: Data from Current Procedural Terminology-Specific Special Questions, 2022 to 2024.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Advanced Practice Providers in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A National Assessment Demonstrates Increasing Prevalence and Unique Practice Characteristics.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Dislocation Risk in Modern Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparing Surgical Approaches With and Without Enabling Technology.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Development and Validation of Case-Finding Algorithms to Identify Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Data.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same author

Characteristics of Adult Reconstructive Hip and Knee Fellowship Graduates Pursuing Private Practice versus Academic Careers.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same author

Working to Mitigate Bias in ABOS Board Certification and Recertification.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025
Same journal

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in the U.S. Patient Population: Prevalence and Epidemiology.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

Trends in Utilization of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the United States.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

The Characteristics of Surgeons Performing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Volume Consistency, Training, and Specialization.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

Review of Common Clinical Conditions of the Proximal Tibiofibular Joint.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

Return to Play After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Prioritizing Neurological and Psychological Factors of the Decision-Making Algorithm.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
Same journal

Preoperative Corticosteroid Use for Medical Conditions is Associated with Increased Postoperative Infectious Complications and Readmissions After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Study.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)·2019
See all related articles

Cemented acetabular revision is a technique for hip replacement reconstruction, but it has poor outcomes. This method is often used for severe bone loss and can include bone grafting and antibiotic cement.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Acetabular reconstruction is a critical component of total hip arthroplasty.
  • Cemented acetabular revision is one technique, though often associated with suboptimal outcomes.
  • Poor results limit its frequent use, especially compared to other revision strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role and outcomes of cemented acetabular revision in complex cases.
  • To identify scenarios where this technique might still be considered.
  • To highlight the advantages and limitations of cemented acetabular revision.

Main Methods:

  • Review of cases undergoing cemented acetabular revision.
  • Analysis of outcomes in patients with severe bone loss.
  • Consideration of adjunctive techniques like bone grafting and reinforcement devices.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Isolated cemented cup revision is infrequently chosen due to poor outcomes.
  • The technique is primarily employed in cases of severe bone loss where biologic fixation is unlikely.
  • Often supplemented with bone grafting and metal reinforcement devices.

Conclusions:

  • Cemented acetabular revision, despite technical improvements, yields poor outcomes.
  • Its application is typically reserved for severe bone loss scenarios.
  • Advantages include antibiotic incorporation and cement mantle customization.