Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Mental health services evaluation].

B Moreno Küstner1, F Torres González, J F Godoy García

  • 1Departamento de Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada, Spain. bertamk@ugr.es

Actas Espanolas De Psiquiatria
|September 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Authors reply. Opinions and expectations of patients with health problems associated to asbestos exposure].

Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra·2015
Same author

[Opinions of healthcare professionals on the definition of severe mental illness: a qualitative study].

Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra·2014
Same author

Estimation of mental health care cost units for patients with schizophrenia.

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2005
Same author

[Assessment of needs for care of a schizophrenic patient sample from the Granada Sur Mental Health Care Area].

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2003
Same author

[Predictors for hospitalization rates of patients with schizophrenia].

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2002
Same author

[Assessment of needs in schizophrenia patients].

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2002
Same journal

Mortality Risks in Patients With Schizophrenia in Shanghai: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2026
Same journal

Causal Relationship Between Vitamin D and Anxiety and Depression: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Mental Health Nurses' Competences: A Scoping Review.

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2026
Same journal

Gender Identity and Gender Dysphoria in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2026
Same journal

Bridging Three Decades: Global Self-Harm Trends From 1990-2021 and Projections to 2040.

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2026
Same journal

ADHD, Subtypes and Cognitive Performance: WISC-V as a Support Tool for Diagnostic Assessment.

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating community mental health services for chronic mental health patients requires assessing structures, processes, and outcomes. This comprehensive approach ensures effective planning and delivery of care within the evolving psychiatric system.

Area of Science:

  • Mental Health Services Research
  • Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Context:

  • The psychiatric reform has increased focus on evaluating community mental health services for chronic mental health patients.
  • Effective evaluation necessitates a multi-faceted approach considering various aspects of care delivery.
  • The paradigm shift in mental health services impacts the entire healthcare system.

Purpose:

  • To outline a framework for in-depth evaluation of community mental health services.
  • To identify key components for assessing the quality of care for chronic mental health patients.
  • To establish the interrelationship between structural, process, and outcome measures in mental health service evaluation.

Summary:

  • Evaluation of mental health services can be structured into three interrelated levels: structures, processes, and results.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Each level requires specific indicators that must be valid, objective, sensitive, and specific.
  • Understanding the types of services, patient demographics, and patient outcomes is crucial for effective evaluation and planning.

    • Impact:

    • Provides a structured methodology for assessing community mental health services.
    • Enhances the quality of care planning for chronic mental health patients.
    • Contributes to the evidence base for mental health service delivery and reform.