Isolation of Enterococcus species from infectious skin lesions

S Higaki1, M Morohashi, T Yamagishi

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama-shi, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.

Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research
|September 13, 2002
PubMed

Insights

Enterococcus faecalis frequently caused secondary infections, particularly in ulcers. Penicillins showed higher effectiveness against E. faecalis compared to E. faecium, highlighting the need for accurate species identification for effective antimicrobial therapy.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Antimicrobial Resistance

Background:

  • Enterococcus species are significant opportunistic pathogens.
  • Secondary infections, such as those from ulcers and decubitus, are common sites for Enterococcus isolation.
  • Understanding the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Enterococcus species is crucial for clinical management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the frequency and sources of Enterococcus faecalis isolation in secondary infections.
  • To compare the antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of different antimicrobial agents against isolated Enterococcus strains.

Main Methods:

  • Bacterial isolation and identification from clinical samples (ulcer/decubitus infections).
  • Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolated Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium strains.
  • Analysis of antimicrobial effectiveness, focusing on penicillins and erythromycin.

Main Results:

  • Enterococcus faecalis was isolated in 70% of cases, predominantly from secondary infections like ulcers.
  • Seven sole/predominant E. faecalis isolates were identified.
  • Penicillins demonstrated greater efficacy against E. faecalis than E. faecium.
  • Higher antimicrobial sensitivities were observed for E. faecalis compared to E. faecium.
  • Some E. faecalis strains exhibited sensitivity to erythromycin, possibly due to reduced resistance mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • Enterococcus faecalis is a frequent causative agent in secondary infections.
  • Penicillin-based therapies may be more effective for E. faecalis infections compared to E. faecium.
  • Accurate characterization of Enterococcus species is essential for selecting appropriate antimicrobial treatments.
  • Further investigation into resistance mechanisms, particularly for erythromycin sensitivity, is warranted.