Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistics review 4: sample size calculations.

Elise Whitley1, Jonathan Ball

  • 1Medical Statistics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Critical Care (London, England)
|September 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding and addressing the obstacles to a trial of face masks in schools: a mixed-methods feasibility study.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2026
Same author

Probing the Small, Medium and Large Amplitude Rheological Properties of Cherry Jell-O<sup>®</sup> as a Model System for Edible Gels.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Is Respiratory Effort an Additional Priority in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome?

Critical care medicine·2025
Same author

Factors associated with the identification and well-being of hidden and confirmed carers: a dyad analysis.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2025
Same author

Ethanol downregulates gastrula gene expression and cell movement, causing symptoms of foetal alcohol spectrum disorders.

Biology open·2025
Same author

Lessons from the PROTECT-CH COVID-19 platform trial in care homes.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2025
Same journal

Efficacy of higher-dose versus lower-dose corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Prehospital lactate, transfer time, and early mortality across emergency diagnostic categories.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Correction: VExUS score: optimizing its use in perioperative and critical care management.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Optimizing β-lactam antibiotics with the highest concentration-for continuous infusion reduce carbon footprint in intensive care.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Physiological and clinical effects of selected airway clearance techniques in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same journal

How we use the neurological pupil index (NPi).

Critical care (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

This review explains statistical power and the risks of under-powered studies. It details sample size calculation methods, considering factors influencing power for common research scenarios.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Under-powered studies pose a significant risk in research, potentially leading to inconclusive or misleading results.
  • Understanding statistical power is crucial for designing robust scientific investigations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the concept of statistical power and its importance in research.
  • To discuss the challenges and methods for calculating appropriate sample sizes.
  • To present practical sample size calculation techniques for common research designs.

Main Methods:

  • The review synthesizes existing literature on statistical power and sample size determination.
  • It outlines key factors influencing statistical power, such as effect size, alpha level, and sample size.
  • Specific calculation methods are presented for two common statistical scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The review highlights the detrimental impact of inadequate sample sizes on study outcomes.
  • It provides a framework for researchers to determine optimal sample sizes.
  • Formulas and approaches for sample size calculation are demonstrated.

Conclusions:

  • Ensuring adequate statistical power through proper sample size calculation is essential for valid research.
  • This review equips researchers with the knowledge to avoid under-powered studies and enhance the reliability of their findings.
  • The presented methods offer practical guidance for sample size planning in various research contexts.