Related Experiment Videos
Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis
Seppo Heinonen1, Esko Tyrväinen, Jorma Penttinen
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland. seppo.heinonen@kuh.fi
Introduction:
The purpose of this study was to note potential gynaecological risk factors leading to intensive care and to estimate the frequency, costs and outcome of management.
Materials And Methods:
In a cross-sectional study of intensive care admissions in Kuopio from March 1993 to December 2000, 23 consecutive gynaecological patients admitted to a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were followed. We recorded demographics, admitting diagnoses, scores on the Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, clinical outcome and treatment costs.
Results:
The overall need for intensive care was 2.3 per 1000 women undergoing major surgery during the study period. Patients were 55.4 +/- 16.9 (mean +/- SD) years old, with a mean APACHE II score of 14.07 (+/- 5.57). The most common diagnoses at admission were postoperative haemorrhage (43%), infection (39%) and cardiovascular disease (30%). The duration of stay in the ICU was 4.97 (+/- 9.28) (range 1-42) days and the mortality within 6 months was 26%, although the mortality in the ICU was 0%. The total cost of intensive care was approximately 7044 US dollars per patient.
Conclusions:
Very few gynaecological patients develop complications requiring intensive care. The presence of gynaecological malignancy and pre-existing medical disorders are clinically useful predictors of eventual outcome, but many cases occur in women with a low risk and this implies that the risk is relevant to all procedures. Further research is needed to determine effective preventive approaches.