Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Mental health issues: ethical considerations.

¹Section of Psychiatry and the Law, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Occupational Medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)

|September 13, 2002

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

Ethics in the locker room: the challenges for team physicians.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002

Same journal

Ethical issues in worker productivity.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002

Same journal

Protecting posterity: the occupational physician's ethical and legal obligations to pregnant workers.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002

Same journal

Genetic testing: ethical implications in the workplace.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002

Same journal

Ethical issues in occupational disease outbreak investigations.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002

Same journal

Ethical issues in occupational health research.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Employer psychiatric evaluations present ethical and legal challenges due to unclear roles. This review covers confidentiality, assessment limitations, and fitness for duty issues in workplace mental health.

Area of Science:

Occupational Health
Psychiatry
Medical Ethics

Background:

Employer-initiated psychiatric evaluations are common in the workplace.
These evaluations present unique ethical and legal considerations for both psychiatrists and employees.
Ambiguity in roles can lead to issues like 'mutual deception'.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the ethical concerns and legal implications of employer-initiated psychiatric evaluations.
To clarify the elements of psychiatric examinations in a workplace setting.
To provide guidance on confidentiality waivers, record ownership, and fitness for duty assessments.

Main Methods:

Review of ethical principles and legal precedents related to workplace mental health evaluations.
Analysis of the distinct aspects of psychiatric evaluations compared to general medical Independent Medical Examinations (IMEs).

Related Experiment Videos

Discussion of practical considerations including information provision, documentation, and dangerousness assessment.

Main Results:

Identifies significant ethical issues stemming from role ambiguity and potential 'mutual deception'.
Outlines common elements of workplace psychiatric examinations and methods for handling confidentiality waivers.
Compares psychiatric and general medical IMEs, addressing ownership of records and interview data.

Conclusions:

Employer-initiated psychiatric evaluations require careful navigation of ethical and legal landscapes.
Clear communication, informed consent, and defined processes are crucial for managing these evaluations.
Addressing issues of dangerousness assessment, treatment, and restoration to fitness is essential for fair and effective outcomes.