Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving informed consent: insights from behavioral decision research.

Margaret Holmes-Rovner1, Celia E Wills

  • 1College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA. Margaret.holmesrovner@ht.msu.edu

Medical Care
|September 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Approaches to Optimize Engagement of Lower Socioeconomic Status Family Caregivers of Black Older Adults Living With Dementia in Advance Care Planning Research.

Research in gerontological nursing·2026
Same author

Surgeon Perspectives on Decisional Antecedents in Preoperative Decision-Making.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

Perspectives of Former Caregivers of Black Older Adults Living With Dementia on Advance Care Planning.

Journal of gerontological nursing·2025
Same author

Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2024
Same author

Quality Improvement Summit 2016: Shared Decision Making and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Urology practice·2023
Same author

Racial differences in prevention decision making among U.S. women at high risk of breast cancer: A qualitative study.

PloS one·2023
Same journal

Hepatitis C Virus Cascade of Care in Florida Emergency Departments.

Medical care·2026
Same journal

Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Uptake of Diabetes Prevention Interventions.

Medical care·2026
Same journal

Machine Learning for Evaluating the Heterogeneous Effects of Intensive In-Hospital Rehabilitation During the Postacute Phase After Hip Fracture Surgery on Activities of Daily Living.

Medical care·2026
Same journal

Hospital-Physician Integration and Differences in the Use of Orthopedic Care Across Race and Ethnicity.

Medical care·2026
Same journal

Temporal Misalignment and Selection Bias in "Burn Pit Smoke Exposure and Sleep Apnea in US Veterans.

Medical care·2026
Same journal

The Impact of an Oncology Hospital at Home Program on Health Care Costs.

Medical care·2026
See all related articles

Informed consent processes need improvement to help patients make better research decisions. Behavioral decision theory suggests "debiasing" techniques can enhance comprehension and decision-making in research participation.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Health Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • The Belmont Report established ethical guidelines for human subject research, emphasizing informed consent.
  • However, the effectiveness of informed consent in aiding patient decisions about research participation remains under-investigated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore behavioral decision theory and research for insights into improving informed consent processes.
  • Identify implications for enhancing patient understanding and decision-making in research.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a traditional literature review.
  • Performed a hand search of relevant academic literature.

Main Results:

  • Cognitive biases in information processing (risk/benefit perception) identified, impacting the informing process.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchEmpirical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Patient decision aids demonstrate feasibility for better patient information and include "debiasing" strategies.
  • Informing and consenting present distinct challenges related to effectiveness and values.

    • Conclusions:

    • Further development and testing of debiasing techniques are crucial for effective patient informing.
    • Consenting involves social and individual values; appealing to altruism may boost participation without compromising voluntariness.
    • More research is needed on problematic information-processing biases in health consent and the impact of altruism appeals on participation.