Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Experiences with endoscopic carpal tunnel release].

Ch Buchli1, D Scharplatz

  • 1Chirurgische Abteilung, Krankenhaus Thusis.

Swiss Surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie Suisse = Chirurgia Svizzera
|September 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary

This study compared open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release outcomes. Both surgical methods showed similar safety and effectiveness, with no significant advantages for the endoscopic approach.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[5 years ATLS (Advanced Trauma Life Support) courses in Switzerland].

Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera·2004
Same author

[Minor craniocerebral trauma].

Praxis·2002
Same author

[ATLS (advanced trauma life support) in Switzerland].

Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera·2001
Same author

[Postoperative stress on by dynamic hip screw or endoprostheses treated femoral neck and pertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients].

Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera·1996
Same author

[Preoperative assessment in an area without continuous medical anesthesia service].

Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera·1995
Same author

[Simulation program for analysis of the capacity of hospitals and areas in emergency situations].

Helvetica chirurgica acta·1994

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Neurosurgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common condition causing hand numbness and weakness.
  • Surgical intervention, including open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release, is a primary treatment option.
  • Evaluating the safety and efficacy of different surgical techniques is crucial for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and results of open carpal tunnel release versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release.
  • To assess the outcomes of single-portal versus two-portal endoscopic techniques.
  • To determine if endoscopic carpal tunnel release offers advantages over the open approach.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 122 carpal tunnel releases performed between 1994 and 2000.
  • Focus on 82 cases: 39 open carpal tunnel release, 26 two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release, and 17 single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release.
  • Evaluation of complication rates, persistent symptoms, and need for reoperation.

Main Results:

  • No major irreversible complications were reported across all surgical groups.
  • Similar outcomes were observed between open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release.
  • Persistent complaints were noted in 9 open, 8 two-portal endoscopic, and 5 single-portal endoscopic cases, with one reoperation in the open and two-portal endoscopic groups each.

Conclusions:

  • Open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy.
  • The endoscopic approach, including single and two-portal techniques, did not show a significant advantage over open surgery.
  • Further research may be needed to explore potential benefits of minimally invasive techniques in specific patient populations.

Related Experiment Videos