Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The benefits and problems associated with minimal access surgery.

Ray Garry

    The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
    |September 17, 2002
    PubMed
    Summary

    Minimal access surgery (MAS) offers short-term patient benefits like less pain and faster recovery in gynecology. However, higher costs and unknown long-term outcomes require careful evaluation of each procedure.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    What Happens to Endometriosis During the Menstrual Cycle?

    Surgical technology international·2024
    Same author

    Re-evaluating the eVALuate study and the NICE guidelines: a personal review.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2016
    Same author

    Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2015
    Same author

    WITHDRAWN: Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis.

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2014
    Same author

    Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2014
    Same author

    Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding.

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2013

    Area of Science:

    • Gynecological Surgery
    • Minimally Invasive Procedures

    Background:

    • The role of minimal access surgery (MAS) in gynecology is debated.
    • Evidence-based assessments are crucial for determining MAS's future in the specialty.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review current evidence on minimal access surgery in gynecology.
    • To assess the benefits and drawbacks of MAS compared to traditional open surgery.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic review of 23 randomized clinical trials involving 2195 patients.
    • Analysis of five gynecological procedures: ectopic pregnancy, ovarian cysts, myomectomy, colposuspension, and hysterectomy.

    Main Results:

    • Uncomplicated MAS procedures provide short-term patient benefits, including reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery.
    • Laparoscopic approaches are associated with immediate patient-centered advantages over open surgery.
    • MAS requires expensive technology, may take longer, incur higher costs, and carries potential new or increased risks of complications.

    Conclusions:

    • While MAS offers significant short-term patient advantages, these must be weighed against disadvantages such as higher costs and technological demands.
    • The long-term outcomes of most MAS procedures are not yet established.
    • Individual assessment of each MAS procedure is necessary, considering both potential benefits and risks.

    Related Experiment Videos