Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Identifying a differential equation for lip motion.

Jorge C Lucero1

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of Brasilia, Brasilia DF 70910-900, Brazil. lucero@mat.unb.br

Medical Engineering & Physics
|September 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Algorithm Verification and Concurrent Validity of a Web-Based Platform for Multiparametric Acoustic Voice Quality Indices.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2026
Same author

Numerical solution of Rothenberg's equation of the glottal airflow rate as a function of the glottal area using backward differentiation (L).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Parametrization of the vocal tract area function using a subset selection approach (L).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

The Performance of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Synthesized Voices.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2021
Same author

Smoothness of an equation for the glottal flow rate versus the glottal area.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2015
Same author

Self-entrainment of the right and left vocal fold oscillators.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2015
Same journal

Enabling laboratory-based personalization of musculoskeletal spine models: a standardized rail-guided ultrasound method.

Medical engineering & physics·2026
Same journal

From diagnostic labels to radiology reports: a unified multi-modal framework for lesion detection and segmentation.

Medical engineering & physics·2026
Same journal

Dual-view cross-semantic graph neural network for predicting intraoperative complications in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Medical engineering & physics·2026
Same journal

Finite element analysis explores ablation depth and optical zone as key determinants of intraocular pressure reduction after refractive surgery.

Medical engineering & physics·2026
Same journal

A preliminary technique development for quantitative analysis of transhumeral bone, post-amputation, using a computed tomography BMD phantom.

Medical engineering & physics·2026
Same journal

Characteristics and performance evaluation of the Maastricht room calorimeter systems.

Medical engineering & physics·2026
See all related articles

Speech analysis reveals lip motion changes with speaking rate. Fast speech shows simple oscillator behavior, while slow speech involves greater external control and variability.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Speech Science
  • Physics of Biological Systems

Background:

  • Understanding lip motion is crucial for speech production research.
  • Previous models often simplify the complex dynamics of articulatory movements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model and characterize human lip motion during speech.
  • To investigate the influence of speaking rate on biomechanical parameters of lip movement.

Main Methods:

  • Fitting a second-order homogeneous differential equation to observed lip trajectories.
  • Analyzing data from fast, normal, and slow speaking rates.

Main Results:

  • At fast speaking rates, lip motion approximates a low-variability mass-spring oscillator at its natural frequency.

Related Experiment Videos

  • At slow speaking rates, increased external control leads to higher variability in lip trajectories.
  • Normal speaking rates exhibit intermediate characteristics.

    • Conclusions:

    • Lip biomechanics during speech are rate-dependent.
    • Speaking rate modulates the balance between intrinsic oscillatory behavior and external trajectory control of the lips.