Related Experiment Videos
Biomechanical analysis of two ulnar head prostheses.
Shunji Masaoka1, Serene H Longsworth, Frederick W Werner
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Institute for Human Performance, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
The Journal of Hand Surgery
|September 20, 2002
Summary
Two ulnar head prostheses were tested for biomechanical effectiveness. Both prostheses maintained near-normal distal radioulnar joint function, suggesting their suitability for restoring joint function after injury.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomechanics
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is crucial for forearm rotation.
- Ulnar head prostheses are used to restore DRUJ function after injury or resection.
- Evaluating the biomechanical effectiveness of these prostheses is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the biomechanical effectiveness of two distinct ulnar head prostheses.
- To compare the biomechanics of the distal radioulnar joint after prosthesis implantation versus intact specimens.
- To evaluate the prostheses' ability to restore normal forearm rotation and joint stability.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 5 fresh-frozen cadaver arms for biomechanical testing.
- Employed electromagnetic sensors to measure forearm rotation, diastasis, and subluxation.
- Tested intact specimens and specimens with two types of ulnar head prostheses.
- Applied loads simulating pronator/supinator muscles for dynamic rotation analysis.
Main Results:
- Forearm rotation decreased in pronation after prosthesis implantation.
- Diastasis generally decreased across most forearm positions.
- Subluxation increased in supination compared to intact specimens.
- Both prostheses demonstrated near-normal DRUJ biomechanics compared to distal ulna resection outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Ulnar head prostheses can effectively restore distal radioulnar joint function.
- Despite minor changes in rotation and subluxation, the prostheses offer a viable alternative to distal ulna resection.
- These prostheses are recommended for improving outcomes in patients with compromised distal radioulnar joint integrity.