Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Limitations on rate discrimination.

Robert P Carlyon1, John M Deeks

  • 1MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, England.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|September 24, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Web-Based Listening Test System for Cochlear Implant Research and its Validation for Remote Testing.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Effect of Taking a Break From Cochlear-Implant Use for Resolving Facial-Nerve Stimulation: A Case Series.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2025
Same author

An Evaluation of the Temporal Integrator Processing Strategy for Cochlear Implants in Comparison to the Clinical Strategy and in Multi-Talker Noise.

Ear and hearing·2025
Same author

A behavioral measure of neural adaptation in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Chronic Auditory-Nerve Implant Enhances Brainstem Phase Locking to Electric Pulse Trains.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2025
Same author

A comparison of electrophysiological measures for characterizing the cochlear-implant electrode-neuron interface.

JASA express letters·2025
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

This study explored how the auditory system processes pitch based on timing cues. Normal hearing listeners could detect pitch changes at higher rates when using binaural cues, suggesting limitations are not purely central.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Temporal pitch processing relies on the timing of neural signals.
  • Understanding these limits is crucial for hearing aid development, especially cochlear implants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the limits of fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination based on temporal cues.
  • To determine how spectral filtering and binaural presentation affect temporal pitch perception.
  • To compare human performance with limitations observed in cochlear implant users.

Main Methods:

  • Harmonic complexes filtered to specific frequency regions (3900-5400 Hz and 7800-10800 Hz) were used as stimuli.
  • Listeners performed a pitch discrimination task (detecting F0 differences) under monaural and binaural conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli were presented in sine phase and alternating phase to manipulate temporal coding.

    • Main Results:

    • Monaural pitch discrimination failed at higher F0s (above 300 Hz) when temporal cues were emphasized (alternating phase).
    • Performance improved at higher F0s when spectral resolution allowed harmonic resolving.
    • Binaural presentation significantly improved pitch discrimination, especially under conditions of poor monaural performance.
    • Listeners could detect small changes in pulse rate (around 20%) at high frequencies (7800-10800 Hz).

    Conclusions:

    • Temporal pitch processing has limitations, particularly at higher pulse rates.
    • Binaural interaction provides access to temporal information not available through monaural processing.
    • The inability of cochlear implant users to process high pulse rates may not solely stem from central pitch limitations.