Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Comments on the Meehl-Waller (2002) procedure for appraisal of path analysis models
Robert C MacCallum1, Michael W Browne, Kristopher J Preacher
1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1222, USA. maccallum.1@osu.edu
Abstract:
P. E. Meehl and N. G. Waller (2002) proposed an innovative method for assessing path analysis models wherein they subjected a given model, along with a set of alternatives, to risky tests using selected elements of a sample correlation matrix. Although the authors find much common ground with the perspective underlying the Meehl-Waller approach, they suggest that there are aspects of the proposed procedure that require close examination and further development. These include the selection of only one subset of correlations to estimate parameters when multiple solutions are generally available, the fact that the risky tests may test only a subset of parameters rather than the full model of interest, and the potential for different results to be obtained from analysis of equivalent models.
Insights
This study examines the Meehl-Waller approach for assessing path analysis models. While acknowledging its strengths, it identifies areas needing further development for robust model evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- The Meehl-Waller (2002) method offers a novel approach to evaluating path analysis models using "risky tests" on correlation matrices.
- This method involves testing a focal model against alternatives using specific subsets of the data.
Discussion:
- The authors identify limitations in the Meehl-Waller approach, including reliance on single correlation subsets for parameter estimation.
- Concerns are raised regarding "risky tests" potentially evaluating only partial model parameters, not the entire model.
- The possibility of divergent outcomes from analyzing equivalent models using this method is also highlighted.
Key Insights:
- The Meehl-Waller method's reliance on specific data subsets may limit comprehensive model assessment.
- Partial testing of parameters by "risky tests" could lead to incomplete model validation.
- The method's sensitivity to equivalent model analysis warrants further investigation.
Outlook:
- Further research is needed to refine parameter estimation strategies within the Meehl-Waller framework.
- Developing methods for more comprehensive "risky tests" is crucial for robust model evaluation.
- Investigating the impact of equivalent models on Meehl-Waller results will enhance its applicability.
Related Concept Videos
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Methods of Medium Optimization

