Comments on the Meehl-Waller (2002) procedure for appraisal of path analysis models

Robert C MacCallum1, Michael W Browne, Kristopher J Preacher

  • 1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1222, USA. maccallum.1@osu.edu

Psychological Methods
|September 24, 2002
PubMed

Insights

This study examines the Meehl-Waller approach for assessing path analysis models. While acknowledging its strengths, it identifies areas needing further development for robust model evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • The Meehl-Waller (2002) method offers a novel approach to evaluating path analysis models using "risky tests" on correlation matrices.
  • This method involves testing a focal model against alternatives using specific subsets of the data.

Discussion:

  • The authors identify limitations in the Meehl-Waller approach, including reliance on single correlation subsets for parameter estimation.
  • Concerns are raised regarding "risky tests" potentially evaluating only partial model parameters, not the entire model.
  • The possibility of divergent outcomes from analyzing equivalent models using this method is also highlighted.

Key Insights:

  • The Meehl-Waller method's reliance on specific data subsets may limit comprehensive model assessment.
  • Partial testing of parameters by "risky tests" could lead to incomplete model validation.
  • The method's sensitivity to equivalent model analysis warrants further investigation.

Outlook:

  • Further research is needed to refine parameter estimation strategies within the Meehl-Waller framework.
  • Developing methods for more comprehensive "risky tests" is crucial for robust model evaluation.
  • Investigating the impact of equivalent models on Meehl-Waller results will enhance its applicability.

Related Concept Videos

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...