Related Experiment Videos
Agricultural development and emigration: rhetoric and reality
The International Migration Review
|October 1, 1986
Summary
Trade liberalization through U.S. development programs may not reduce international labor migration. Analysis of tomato trade between Mexico and the U.S. indicates uncertain effects on migrant flows.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Economics
- International Trade Policy
- Migration Studies
Background:
- U.S. development programs, like the Caribbean Basin Initiative, assume trade liberalization reduces labor migration.
- The effectiveness of commodity trade as a substitute for international labor migration remains largely untested.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of trade liberalization on international labor migration.
- To evaluate the premise that increased commodity trade can substitute for labor migration, particularly illegal migration to the U.S.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of U.S. tomato production regions in Sinaloa, Mexico, and Florida.
- Examination of trade flows and their correlation with migration patterns.
Main Results:
- The study suggests that the relationship between trade liberalization and international labor migration is uncertain.
- Increased commodity trade may not definitively decrease, and could potentially influence, the flow of migrants.
Conclusions:
- The assumption that trade liberalization under U.S. development programs will reduce labor migration requires further empirical validation.
- Policy implications for managing migration flows through trade initiatives need careful consideration.
Keywords:
Agricultural DevelopmentAgricultureAmericasCaribbeanCentral AmericaCommerceDemographic FactorsDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesDevelopment PlanningEconomic DevelopmentEconomic FactorsFloridaIllegal MigrantsInternational MigrationLatin AmericaMacroeconomic FactorsMexicoMigrantsMigrationNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaPopulationPopulation DynamicsRural DevelopmentUnited States