Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The 1990 U.S. census: how good is good enough?

B Robey

    Asian and Pacific Population Forum
    |October 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Speeding the reproductive revolution.

    People & the planet·2002
    Same author

    Toward a blue revolution.

    Global issues (Washington, D.C.)·2002
    Same author

    Male participation in reproductive health.

    Network (Research Triangle Park, N.C.)·2002
    Same author

    Why family planning matters.

    Population reports. Series J, Family planning programs·2000
    Same author

    Meeting unmet need: new strategies.

    Population reports. Series J, Family planning programs·1996
    Same author

    Helping the news media cover family planning.

    Population reports. Series J, Family planning programs·1995

    The 1990 US census, despite aiming for accuracy, may miss millions, disproportionately affecting minority and low-income populations. This undercount raises significant concerns regarding political representation and federal fund allocation.

    Area of Science:

    • Demography
    • Sociology
    • Public Policy

    Background:

    • The U.S. census is critical for political apportionment and federal funding distribution.
    • Accurate population counts are essential for equitable resource allocation and representation.
    • Previous census efforts have faced challenges with undercounting specific demographic groups.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe the plans for the 1990 U.S. census.
    • To examine the controversy surrounding the adjustment for census undercounts.
    • To highlight the implications of undercoverage for political representation and funding.

    Main Methods:

    • Statistical methods for measuring census undercounting.
    • Analysis of census data and demographic trends.
    Keywords:
    AmericasCensusData AdjustmentDeveloped CountriesEconomic FactorsError SourcesLow Income PopulationMeasurementNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaOrganization And AdministrationPlanningPolitical FactorsPopulation StatisticsResearch MethodologySocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsSocioeconomic StatusUndercountUnited States

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of policy debates regarding census adjustment.

    • Main Results:

    • The 1990 census, while advanced, is projected to miss 2-3 million individuals.
    • Undercounts are concentrated among poor, Black, and Hispanic populations.
    • Despite reliable statistical methods, census counts have not historically been adjusted.

    Conclusions:

    • The undercount in the 1990 census poses significant challenges for equitable representation and funding.
    • The debate over adjusting census counts for undercoverage is a critical policy issue.
    • Ensuring accuracy and addressing undercounts are vital for democratic processes and social equity.