Related Experiment Videos
Approaching complete peroxisome characterization by gas-phase fractionation
Eugene C Yi1, Marcello Marelli, Hookeun Lee
1The Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.
Electrophoresis
|September 26, 2002
Summary
Gas-phase fractionation (GPF) enhances proteome coverage and reproducibility in mass spectrometry. GPF in the m/z dimension identified 1.3x more proteins, improving yeast whole-cell lysate and peroxisomal protein analysis.
Area of Science:
- Proteomics
- Analytical Chemistry
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Direct microliquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (microLC/ESI-MS/MS) is crucial for proteome analysis.
- Improving proteome coverage and reproducibility in peptide ion selection remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of gas-phase fractionation (GPF) for enhancing proteome coverage and reproducibility.
- To compare GPF in the m/z dimension (GPF(m/z)) and relative ion intensity dimension (GPF(RI)) with standard methods.
Main Methods:
- Proteolytic digestion of yeast whole-cell lysate and peroxisomal membrane protein fractions.
- Analysis using direct microLC/ESI-MS/MS with and without GPF.
- GPF applied in the m/z dimension across specific ranges and in the relative ion intensity dimension.
Main Results:
- GPF(m/z) identified 1.3x more proteins than triplicate standard analysis for yeast whole-cell lysate, with lower average codon bias.
- GPF(RI) identified more proteins per m/z unit scanned compared to GPF(m/z) and standard analysis.
- GPF(m/z) detected 93% of known peroxisomal proteins, significantly higher than the 73% detected by standard scans.
Conclusions:
- GPF, particularly GPF(m/z), significantly improves proteome coverage and reproducibility in microLC/ESI-MS/MS.
- GPF is effective for analyzing complex proteomes, including specific fractions like peroxisomal membrane proteins.