Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

10:36
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
Published on: August 3, 2018
[Modeling matching error and its effect on estimates of census coverage error]
Summary
This study introduces a model to assess how matching errors impact census undercount estimates, crucial for improving accuracy in the U.S. census undercount evaluation program.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Demography
- Survey Methodology
Background:
- Census data is vital for resource allocation and policy.
- Accurate census counts are essential for representative democracy.
- Undercounts in censuses can lead to significant demographic and socioeconomic misrepresentations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a statistical model for evaluating the impact of matching error on census undercount estimators.
- To analyze the components of mean square error (MSE) attributable to matching discrepancies.
- To illustrate the application of the model using data from the 1990 U.S. census undercount evaluation program.
Main Methods:
- Development of a statistical model to quantify matching error effects.
- Derivation of the mean square error (MSE) for the dual system estimator under the proposed model.
- Analysis of MSE components specifically related to matching errors.
Main Results:
- The study defines and explains the components of MSE arising from matching error.
- It quantifies the effect of matching error on the estimator of census undercount under the assumed model.
- A methodology for optimizing the design of matching error evaluation studies is presented.
Conclusions:
- Matching error significantly influences the accuracy of census undercount estimates.
- The proposed model provides a framework for understanding and mitigating these errors.
- The findings support the development of more robust census evaluation methodologies.
Related Concept Videos
Margin of Error
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Contaminants and Errors
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

