Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Identifying and quantifying sources of variation in microarray data using high-density cDNA membrane arrays.

Kevin R Coombes1, W Edward Highsmith, Tammy A Krogmann

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology
|September 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tissue-aware elastic net decomposition reveals shared and lineage-specific drug response biomarkers.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Context-dependent correlations mislead transcriptomic network inference in bulk and single-cell data.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

WayFindR: investigating feedback in biological pathways.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Clustering Digestive Tract Tumors Using Transcriptomic and Mutation Data.

Cancers·2026
Same author

A shape-constrained regression and wild bootstrap framework for reproducible drug synergy testing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Multiomic characterization, early detection, and therapeutic targeting of myeloid sarcoma.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Microarray experiments generate variability, impacting biological difference accuracy. Reusing membranes significantly increases variation, but limiting use to four times and standardizing exposure times can improve data reliability.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Microarray experiments are crucial for gene expression analysis.
  • Multiple experimental steps introduce variability, affecting data accuracy.
  • Understanding sources of variation is key to reliable microarray results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify sources of variation in high-density cDNA microarray experiments.
  • To identify the most significant contributors to experimental variability.
  • To provide recommendations for minimizing variation in microarray studies.

Main Methods:

  • Repeated microarray experiments using high-density cDNA membranes and 33P-labeled targets.
  • RNA extraction from a Burkitt lymphoma cell line (GA-10).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantitative assessment of variation using ANOVA adapted for multivariate microarray data and qualitative assessment via clustering algorithms.

    • Main Results:

    • Membrane reuse was the largest contributor to variation (38%).
    • Differences in membranes and exposure times each accounted for approximately 10% of variation.
    • Target preparation differences (<5%) and image quantification (negligible) had minimal impact.

    Conclusions:

    • Reusing microarray membranes significantly increases experimental variation, primarily due to background radiation.
    • Limiting membrane reuse to a maximum of four times can mitigate this effect.
    • Standardizing exposure times minimizes variation associated with scanning processes, enhancing data reliability.