Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Chamber test versus patch test for epicutaneous testing.

V Pirilä

    Contact Dermatitis
    |January 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A novel chamber test for epicutaneous testing offers significant advantages over traditional patch tests. This improved method enhances diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in allergy testing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Thiokol as a frequent cause of dermatitis.

    Acta allergologica·2014
    Same author

    The role of lymph node puncture in early detection of syphilis.

    Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja·2010
    Same author

    A new method for testing tuberculin skin reactivity--chamber test.

    Tubercle·1984
    Same author

    Quantification of the excited skin syndrome (the "angry back"). Retesting one patch at a time.

    Contact dermatitis·1982
    Same author

    Unsuitability of bakery work for a person with atopy: a study of 234 bakery workers.

    Annals of allergy·1979
    Same author

    Cross-sensitivity within the neomycin group of antibiotics.

    Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum·1979
    Same journal

    Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Propylene Glycol and Related Glycols: Cosmetic Skin Sensitisers After All?

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Acrylate Copolymers/Crosspolymers in Sunscreens: Minimally Allergenic, Without Evidence of Need for Avoidance by (Meth)Acrylate-Sensitized Individuals.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    AI-Assisted Automated Two-Stage Patch Test Interpretation System Using Vision Transformer.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Use of Tralokinumab in a Hairdresser With Severe Chronic Hand Eczema and Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Cyclohexyl Diethanolamine in a Metalworking Fluid.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    Same journal

    Fragrance and Preservative Contact Allergens in Cosmetic and Household Cleaning Products in Turkey: Variation by Target Population, Product Type and Manufacturing Origin.

    Contact dermatitis·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Dermatology
    • Allergology
    • Clinical Immunology

    Background:

    • Epicutaneous testing is crucial for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis.
    • Traditional patch testing methods have limitations in accuracy and patient comfort.
    • The chamber test is an alternative diagnostic approach for skin allergies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a modified chamber test for epicutaneous testing.
    • To present improvements in the auxiliary equipment used for the chamber test.
    • To highlight the advantages of the new chamber test over the conventional patch test.

    Main Methods:

    • A modified chamber test apparatus was developed.
    • Improved auxiliary equipment was designed to support the chamber test.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The modified chamber test was compared to the customary patch test.

    • Main Results:

    • The modified chamber test demonstrated several remarkable advantages.
    • Detailed descriptions of these advantages are provided.
    • The improved equipment facilitates easier and more accurate testing.

    Conclusions:

    • The modified chamber test represents a significant advancement in epicutaneous testing.
    • This method offers superior benefits compared to standard patch testing.
    • The enhanced chamber test improves the diagnostic process for skin allergies.