Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Role of responsibility in conditional reasoning.

Francesco Mancini1, Amelia Gangemi

  • 1Scuola di Specializzazione in Psicoterapia, Cognitiva Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva, Roma, Italy. mancini@apc.it

Psychological Reports
|October 2, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Human reasoning is influenced by responsibility. When individuals feel responsible, they employ a falsification strategy to identify potential rule violators, unlike in non-responsibility contexts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emotional Reactions Following Silent Treatment: The Role of Guilt.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

Socio-demographic variables among a group of patients with cognitive decline.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Cross-sectional and prospective relations between dysfunctional cognitive beliefs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms during late childhood and early adolescence: a test of two aetiological models.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2025
Same author

Mediational Roles of Not Just Right Experiences and Disgust Proneness Between Deontological Guilt and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2025
Same author

Beyond the Scars: An Analysis of Adverse Childhood Experiences and the Interconnections Between Emotion Dysregulation, Dissociation, and Trauma in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

Guilt emotion and decision-making under uncertainty.

Frontiers in psychology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Previous research indicates perceived utilities can facilitate performance on the Wason Selection Task.
  • The role of perceived utilities in human reasoning, particularly within responsibility contexts, remains less explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if perceived utilities, similar to Wason Selection Task findings, influence human reasoning in responsibility contexts.
  • To examine how responsibility contexts affect reasoning strategies and the search for potential rule violators.

Main Methods:

  • A selection task was administered to 270 subjects across two conditions: one with a responsibility context and one without.
  • Participant responses were analyzed to compare reasoning strategies between the two conditions.

Main Results:

  • Reasoning strategies differed significantly based on the presence or absence of a responsibility context.
  • A falsification strategy, aimed at identifying potential violators, was predominantly observed only in the responsibility context.

Conclusions:

  • Responsibility significantly impacts human reasoning strategies, specifically promoting a falsification approach.
  • Normative goals and social roles appear to motivate individuals to actively seek out rule violations when responsible.

Related Experiment Videos