Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.4K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

716
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
716
False Memories01:18

False Memories

706
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
706
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

258
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
258

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relationships Between Fat Mass and Lean Mass.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2019
Same author

Commentary on the Article "Improving the Prediction of Maturity From Anthropometric Variables Using a Maturity Ratio".

Pediatric exercise science·2017
Same author

The new body mass index as a predictor of postoperative complications in elective colorectal cancer surgery.

Clinical nutrition ESPEN·2017
Same author

Relationships among fat mass, fat-free mass and height in adults: A new method of statistical analysis applied to NHANES data.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2016
Same author

Relations between body mass, height, fat mass, and waist circumference in American and Korean men and women.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2015
Same author

Sitting height as a better predictor of body mass than total height and (body mass)/(sitting height)(3) as an index of build.

Annals of human biology·2014
Same journal

Channelling Socrates to re-imagine asynchronous online learning.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Moving beyond tokenism: A structured and intentional approach to embedding health advocacy in medical education.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

7.8K

Misinformation, partial knowledge and guessing in true/false tests.

Richard F Burton1

  • 1Thomson Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. R.F.Burton@bio.gla.ac.uk

Medical Education
|October 2, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Negative marking in true/false tests can cause over-cautiousness, but blind guessing under number-right scoring often has a greater negative impact on test reliability. This research clarifies guessing and risk-taking effects.

More Related Videos

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

39.8K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

7.8K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

39.8K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychometrics
  • Assessment Design

Background:

  • Debate exists regarding negative marking in multiple-choice and true/false tests.
  • Previous discussions often overlook misinformation and the role of partial knowledge in guessing.
  • Variations in risk-taking due to negative marking are frequently analyzed in absolute terms, ignoring guessing's impact on reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the impact of misinformation and partial knowledge on test scoring.
  • To compare the detrimental effects of guessing versus variable risk-taking on test reliability.
  • To analyze the influence of negative marking on student response strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of three studies involving medical students' responses to true/false tests.
  • Comparison of negative marking versus number-right scoring methods.
  • Application of a statistical model to assess risk-taking variations against guessing unreliability.

Main Results:

  • Partial knowledge presents fewer issues with independent true/false items.
  • Blind guessing under number-right scoring generally reduces test reliability more than over-cautiousness from negative marking.
  • Students may not fully leverage partial knowledge when negative marking is applied.

Conclusions:

  • Negative marking's impact on reliability is often less severe than blind guessing.
  • True/false tests with independent items are less susceptible to issues with partial knowledge.
  • Assessment designers should consider the differential impact of scoring methods on guessing and risk-taking behavior.