Related Experiment Videos
Estimating cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis patients from various MR pulse sequences
1Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Summary
Cerebral atrophy (CA) measurements in multiple sclerosis (MS) are significantly affected by MRI pulse sequence (PS) and segmentation algorithm (SA). Consistent use of PS and SA is crucial for reliable CA progression tracking in MS clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Medical Physics
- Neurology
Background:
- Cerebral atrophy (CA) is a key indicator of disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS).
- Accurate quantification of CA is essential for monitoring treatment efficacy in clinical trials.
- Standardization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and analysis techniques is needed for reliable CA assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different pulse sequences (PS) and segmentation algorithms (SA) on cerebral atrophy (CA) measurements in MS patients and healthy controls (HCs).
- To evaluate the variability in brain fractional volume (BFV) changes due to varying MRI parameters.
Main Methods:
- MRI scans from 10 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients and 5 HCs were analyzed over two years.
- T1-weighted, FLAIR, and PD/T2-weighted sequences were used.
- Brain volume segmentation was performed using histogram SA, adaptive fuzzy c-means (AFCM), and adaptive Bayesian with K-means clustering.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in percent change of brain fractional volume (BFV) were observed in MS patients based on combinations of SA and PS.
- BFV changes in MS patients ranged from +2.05% to -1.6% in year one and +0.79% to -3.11% in year two.
- Healthy controls showed smaller BFV fluctuations, ranging from +0.26% to -0.29%.
Conclusions:
- MRI-based CA estimates are demonstrably dependent on the chosen PS and SA.
- Consistency in SA and PS selection is vital for longitudinal MS studies and treatment trials.
- CA progression should be considered a secondary or tertiary outcome measure in MS trials until analysis techniques are better understood.