Related Experiment Videos
Treatment planning processes in dental schools
Charles R Hook1, Robert W Comer, Robert M Trombly
1Medical University of South Carolina College of Dental Medicine, USA.
Journal of Dental Education
|October 3, 2002
Summary
This study surveyed U.S. dental schools on treatment planning processes. Findings reveal common practices in patient assignment and plan development, with patient welfare prioritized, but variations exist in multidisciplinary case management and risk disclosure.
Area of Science:
- Dental Education
- Clinical Dentistry
- Curriculum Development
Background:
- Treatment planning is crucial in dental education, yet under-documented in literature.
- Existing dental school curricula lack clear evaluation of treatment planning courses.
- Integration of academic clinical settings with treatment planning needs further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey and profile current treatment planning processes in U.S. dental schools.
- To identify similarities and variations in how dental schools approach treatment planning.
- To assess the integration of treatment planning into the academic clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire with 29 items on treatment plan preparation, process, and outcomes was distributed.
- Surveys were mailed to 54 U.S. dental schools, with 47 (87%) returning completed responses.
- Key topics included patient assignment, planning, sequencing, presentation, informed consent, and modifications.
Main Results:
- Patient welfare is the primary determinant (92%) of treatment plans.
- Accreditation standards influence plans, alongside quantitative requirements.
- Most plans are completed by the second patient visit post-screening.
- Multidisciplinary planning approaches vary; some schools decentralize planning.
- Risk disclosure to patients during plan presentation is inconsistent (less than 50%).
Conclusions:
- Dental schools share common treatment planning procedures, prioritizing patient welfare.
- Variations in managing complex cases and disclosing risks highlight areas for improvement.
- Further research is needed on evaluating treatment planning education and its clinical integration.