Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bioethics: past, present, and an open future.

Erich H Loewy1

  • 1University of California, Davis, USA.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics : CQ : the International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees
|October 4, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethics and evidence-based medicine: is there a conflict?

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007
Same author

Framing issues in health care: do American ideals demand basic health care and other social necessities for all?

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·2007
Same author

Readers' responses and authors' replies to "healthcare and the hospital chaplain".

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007
Same author

Oaths for physicians--necessary protection or elaborate hoax?

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007
Same author

Healthcare systems and motivation.

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007
Same author

Healthcare and the hospital chaplain.

MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine·2007

Bioethics, a growing field, needs professional standards and a focus on equitable healthcare access. Current bioethics often neglects systemic issues and the needs of underserved populations, hindering its professional development and social responsibility.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Ethics
  • Professional Ethics

Background:

  • Bioethics emerged post-WWII, primarily in the US, and is expanding globally.
  • The field currently lacks professional self-definition, clear criteria, and standardized training assurance.
  • Historical development has disproportionately focused on individuals with healthcare access, neglecting broader societal issues.

Discussion:

  • The current practice of bioethics, particularly in the US, emphasizes individualistic concerns like end-of-life decisions and reproductive technologies.
  • Systemic issues, such as lack of healthcare access, are often dismissed as "system errors" outside the profession's purview.
  • There's a critique that bioethicists have become part of the establishment, prioritizing niche debates over equitable healthcare distribution.

Key Insights:

Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bioethics requires defined standards and methods to ensure qualified practitioners.
  • A significant gap exists in addressing healthcare access disparities within the bioethics discourse.
  • The profession's focus on individualistic ethics has led to a neglect of social responsibility.

Outlook:

  • Addressing the lack of professional definition and training is crucial for bioethics' maturation.
  • Future bioethics must integrate social responsibility and advocate for equitable healthcare access for all.
  • Realigning the mission towards broader societal impact is essential for bioethics to be recognized as a legitimate profession.