Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protecting patient privacy in clinical data mining.

Linda K Goodwin1, Jonathan C Prather

  • 1Nursing Informatics Program, Duke University, USA.

Journal of Healthcare Information Management : JHIM
|October 9, 2002
PubMed
Summary

HIPAA de-identification standards were examined in a Duke University clinical data mining study. Results indicate that privacy concerns may persist in de-identified clinical databases despite improved standards.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Database management systems--their place in nursing informatics education.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2010
Same author

Late steroid withdrawal and cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients.

Transplantation·2008
Same author

Long-term kidney regraft survival from deceased donors: risk factors and outcomes in a single center.

Transplantation·2008
Same author

Predictors of preterm birth in birth certificate data.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2008
Same author

Selective, concurrent bilateral nephrectomies at renal transplantation for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

The Journal of urology·2007
Same author

Living unrelated donor renal transplantation: a single center experience.

The Journal of urology·2005

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Data Privacy
  • Clinical Data Mining

Background:

  • The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) established de-identification standards for protected health information.
  • The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) also proposed de-identification standards.
  • Evaluating compliance with these standards in real-world studies is crucial for data privacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess whether HIPAA de-identification requirements and proposed AAMC standards were met in a large-scale clinical data mining study.
  • To investigate potential privacy issues in de-identified clinical databases.
  • To analyze the effectiveness of de-identification methods in the context of large clinical datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large clinical data mining study conducted at Duke University between 1997 and 2001.
  • Evaluation of the study's data against HIPAA de-identification requirements.
  • Assessment of the study's data against proposed AAMC de-identification standards.
  • Review of privacy implications in the de-identified dataset.

Main Results:

  • The clinical data mining study was conducted prior to the final HIPAA rule publication.
  • HIPAA has led to improvements in de-identification standards for clinical data.
  • Despite adherence to standards, privacy issues may still exist in de-identified large clinical databases.

Conclusions:

  • While HIPAA has enhanced de-identification protocols, residual privacy risks can remain in large clinical databases.
  • Continuous evaluation of de-identification methods is necessary to ensure robust data privacy.
  • The study highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing data utility with patient privacy in clinical research.

Related Experiment Videos